JAAA vs. FFRHX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both funds - JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while FFRHX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JAAA returned 4.80%/yr vs 5.42%/yr for FFRHX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JAAA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.

Performance

JAAA vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAAA achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 1.82% return.

JAAA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.95%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 6.67%
• 5Y*: 4.80%
• 10Y*: —

FFRHX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 5.90%
• 3Y*: 7.48%
• 5Y*: 5.42%
• 10Y*: 4.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAAA vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	1.95%	5.16%	7.43%	8.59%	0.49%	1.39%	0.76%
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	1.82%	5.47%	7.10%	12.63%	-1.55%	5.01%	3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JAAA and FFRHX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2020	0.12

Return for Risk

JAAA vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAAA

JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FFRHX

FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAAA vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JAAA	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.15	2.51	+3.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	10.31	5.98	+4.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.77	1.89	+0.88
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.24	4.97	+8.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	71.21	17.53	+53.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JAAA vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAAA Sharpe Ratio is 6.15, which is higher than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAAA and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JAAA	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.15	2.51	+3.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.88	1.89	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.78	1.15	+1.63

Drawdowns

JAAA vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum FFRHX drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAA and FFRHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAAA	FFRHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.64%	-22.20%	+19.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.39%	-1.19%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.46%	-3.29%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.64%	-5.90%	+3.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.33%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.25%	-1.15%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	0.34%	-0.27%

Volatility

JAAA vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) is 0.13%, while Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that JAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JAAA	FFRHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.13%	0.63%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.64%	1.63%	-0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84%	2.36%	-1.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.68%	2.88%	-1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.64%	4.14%	-2.50%

JAAA vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

JAAA vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

JAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than FFRHX's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	7.09%	7.41%	6.94%	8.24%	3.81%	2.74%	3.84%	5.15%	4.74%	4.05%	4.44%	3.69%
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	4.99%	5.30%	6.35%	6.11%	2.74%	1.21%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JAAA and FFRHX in my portfolio?

JAAA and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JAAA or FFRHX?

FFRHX has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAAA dropped -2.64% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.15 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.