JAAA vs. CGCB

Last updated Apr 11, 2026

JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) and CGCB (Capital Group Core Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while CGCB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Capital Group. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JAAA returned 6.76% vs 6.27% for CGCB. At 0.00, their price movements are largely independent. JAAA charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for CGCB.

Performance

JAAA vs. CGCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAAA achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than CGCB's 0.27% return.

JAAA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 6.76%
• 3Y*: 6.75%
• 5Y*: 4.65%
• 10Y*: —

CGCB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 0.27%
• 6M: 0.80%
• 1Y: 6.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAAA vs. CGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	0.99%	5.16%	7.43%	2.18%
CGCB Capital Group Core Bond ETF	0.27%	7.29%	1.44%	6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JAAA and CGCB is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.00

Return for Risk

JAAA vs. CGCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAAA

JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 96
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

CGCB

CGCB Risk / Return Rank: 30
CGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
CGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
CGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
CGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAAA vs. CGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) and Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JAAA	CGCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	6.26	1.51	+4.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	12.86	2.21	+10.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.09	1.27	+1.83
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.74	2.02	+3.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	49.50	6.74	+42.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JAAA vs. CGCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAAA Sharpe Ratio is 6.26, which is higher than the CGCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAAA and CGCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JAAA	CGCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.26	1.51	+4.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.72	1.15	+1.56

Drawdowns

JAAA vs. CGCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum CGCB drawdown of -5.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAA and CGCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAAA	CGCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.64%	-5.17%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.39%	-2.72%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.61%	+1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.26%	-1.32%	+1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.12%	0.82%	-0.70%

Volatility

JAAA vs. CGCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) is 0.36%, while Capital Group Core Bond ETF (CGCB) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that JAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JAAA	CGCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.36%	1.63%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.68%	2.61%	-1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52%	4.25%	-2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.69%	5.45%	-3.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.66%	5.45%	-3.79%

JAAA vs. CGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAAA has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than CGCB's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JAAA vs. CGCB - Dividend Comparison

JAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than CGCB's 4.22% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	5.13%	5.30%	6.35%	6.11%	2.74%	1.21%	0.26%
CGCB Capital Group Core Bond ETF	4.22%	4.22%	3.99%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%