JA vs. RAAA

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

JA (Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF) and RAAA (Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RAAA.

Performance

JA vs. RAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF (JA) and Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RAAA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.69%
• 6M: 2.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JA vs. RAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JA Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF	1.64%
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between JA and RAAA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.11

Return for Risk

JA vs. RAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF (JA) and Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

JA vs. RAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JA drawdown since its inception was -0.51%, smaller than the maximum RAAA drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JA and RAAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JA	RAAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	-0.71%	+0.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-0.06%	+0.01%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JA	RAAA	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52%	1.35%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.52%	1.35%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.52%	1.35%	+0.17%

JA vs. RAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAA's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

JA vs. RAAA - Dividend Comparison

JA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than RAAA's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
JA Janus Henderson AA-A CLO ETF	1.28%	0.00%
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	4.77%	2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JA and RAAA in my portfolio?

JA and RAAA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JA or RAAA?

On fees, JA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JA or RAAA?

JA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JA or RAAA?

RAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 1.28% for JA.

What is the main difference between JA and RAAA?

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JA and 0.30% for RAAA.