IZRL vs. GTEK

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

IZRL (ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF) and GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. IZRL is passively managed, while GTEK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IZRL returned 17.32%/yr vs 29.45%/yr for GTEK. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IZRL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GTEK.

Performance

IZRL vs. GTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IZRL achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly lower than GTEK's 42.08% return.

IZRL

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: -4.63%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 1Y: 12.51%
• 3Y*: 17.32%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: —

GTEK

• 1D: -4.38%
• 1M: -3.33%
• 6M: 34.40%
• YTD: 42.08%
• 1Y: 59.49%
• 3Y*: 29.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IZRL vs. GTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IZRL ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF	1.97%	36.94%	15.28%	11.39%	-38.61%	-4.99%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	42.08%	23.68%	15.94%	33.58%	-46.73%	-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IZRL and GTEK is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021	0.77

The correlation between IZRL and GTEK shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IZRL vs. GTEK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IZRL	GTEK
Technology	37.7%	74.5%
Healthcare	15.6%	1.1%
Communication Services	12.5%	3.7%
Financial Services	4.8%	1.2%
Industrials	2.8%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	1.9%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	3.4%
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	2.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IZRL vs. GTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IZRL

IZRL Risk / Return Rank: 20
IZRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
IZRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
IZRL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
IZRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
IZRL Martin Ratio Rank: 20

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 81
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 71
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IZRL vs. GTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IZRL	GTEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	2.01	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	2.56	-1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.33	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	5.37	-4.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.86	15.79	-13.93

IZRL vs. GTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IZRL Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the GTEK Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IZRL and GTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IZRL vs. GTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IZRL drawdown since its inception was -59.98%, which is greater than GTEK's maximum drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IZRL and GTEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	IZRL	GTEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.98%	-53.77%	-6.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.27%	-11.13%	-7.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.60%	-27.49%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.14%	-9.70%	-7.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.67%	-26.99%	+1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.75%	3.78%	+2.97%

Volatility

IZRL vs. GTEK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is 7.37%, while Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a volatility of 12.78%. This indicates that IZRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IZRL	GTEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.37%	12.78%	-5.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.04%	26.10%	-8.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.53%	29.74%	-7.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.57%	28.82%	-4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.91%	28.82%	-3.91%

IZRL vs. GTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IZRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GTEK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

IZRL vs. GTEK - Dividend Comparison

IZRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IZRL ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF	2.54%	2.59%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.34%	0.00%	2.15%	3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IZRL and GTEK in my portfolio?

IZRL and GTEK have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IZRL or GTEK?

GTEK has higher volatility (12.78%) compared to IZRL (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IZRL dropped -59.98% vs GTEK's -53.77%.

Which ETF is better, IZRL or GTEK?

On 3-year performance, GTEK leads with 29.45% vs 17.32% for IZRL. On fees, IZRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, IZRL has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IZRL or GTEK?

Over the 3-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 29.45% return vs 17.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IZRL or GTEK?

IZRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IZRL or GTEK?

IZRL has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.

What is the main difference between IZRL and GTEK?

They also come from different issuers: ARK and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IZRL and 0.75% for GTEK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.