IZRL vs. QQQ
IZRL (ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IZRL is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ARK Israeli Innovation Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IZRL returned 0.63%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IZRL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
IZRL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IZRL achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
IZRL
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- 20.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.63%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
IZRL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IZRL ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF | 4.08% | 36.94% | 15.28% | 11.39% | -38.61% | -3.55% | 34.12% | 21.75% | -6.17% | 1.69% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between IZRL and QQQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2017 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IZRL and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
IZRL vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IZRL
QQQ
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IZRL
QQQ
Healthcare
IZRL
QQQ
Communication Services
IZRL
QQQ
Industrials
IZRL
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
IZRL
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
IZRL
QQQ
Financial Services
IZRL
QQQ
Basic Materials
IZRL
-
QQQ
Energy
IZRL
-
QQQ
Real Estate
IZRL
-
QQQ
Utilities
IZRL
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IZRL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
IZRL
QQQ
IZRL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IZRL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.45 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 3.51 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 13.49 | -8.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IZRL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.64 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.81 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.41 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IZRL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IZRL drawdown since its inception was -59.98%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IZRL and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IZRL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.98% | -82.97% | +22.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.27% | -11.96% | -6.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.60% | -22.77% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.21% | -35.12% | -18.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.42% | -0.26% | -15.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.77% | -32.79% | +7.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 3.11% | +3.09% |
Volatility
IZRL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that IZRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IZRL | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 4.49% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.26% | 12.10% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 15.94% | +5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 22.38% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.84% | 22.29% | +2.55% |
IZRL vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IZRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IZRL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
IZRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IZRL ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF | 2.49% | 2.59% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IZRL and QQQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IZRL has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IZRL dropped -59.98% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 0.63% for IZRL. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 0.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IZRL.
IZRL has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
IZRL is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. IZRL tracks ARK Israeli Innovation Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IZRL and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IZRL and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer