IYZ vs. LRCU
IYZ (iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYZ is a Communications Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. IYZ is passively managed, while LRCU is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYZ charges 0.42%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.
Performance
IYZ vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYZ achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 268.21% return.
IYZ
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 29.57%
- 6M
- 32.60%
- 1Y
- 58.27%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 5.94%
LRCU
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 57.23%
- YTD
- 268.21%
- 6M
- 315.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYZ vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF | 29.57% | 11.90% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 268.21% | 172.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYZ and LRCU is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYZ vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank
IYZ
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IYZ vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYZ | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.99 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYZ vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYZ drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than LRCU's maximum drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYZ and LRCU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYZ | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.11% | -40.09% | -37.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | 0.00% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.10% | -9.34% | -30.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | — | — |
Volatility
IYZ vs. LRCU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYZ | LRCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 113.97% | -95.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 113.97% | -95.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 113.97% | -94.67% |
IYZ vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYZ vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison
IYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF | 1.53% | 2.04% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 2.60% | 2.36% | 2.15% | 3.54% | 2.27% | 1.98% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYZ and LRCU have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IYZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IYZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
IYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
IYZ is categorized as Communications Equities, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYZ and 1.30% for LRCU.
Find the right allocation for IYZ and LRCU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer