PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYZ vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYZ vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYZ achieves a 32.03% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.


IYZ

1D
-2.96%
1M
4.94%
YTD
32.03%
6M
38.73%
1Y
59.79%
3Y*
30.34%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
6.28%

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYZ vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
32.03%29.28%20.53%3.36%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IYZ and IBIC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

0.02

The correlation between IYZ and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYZ vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYZ
IYZ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYZ vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYZIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

2.24

-0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.54

17.27

-7.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.08

67.45

-35.37

IYZ vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYZ Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYZ and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYZIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

5.05

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

3.49

-3.42

Drawdowns

IYZ vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYZ drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYZ and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYZIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.11%

-0.90%

-76.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-0.26%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-0.13%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-0.10%

-40.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

0.07%

+1.80%

Volatility

IYZ vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that IYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYZIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

0.33%

+7.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

0.67%

+14.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.95%

0.90%

+17.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.75%

1.58%

+17.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

1.58%

+17.67%

IYZ vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYZ vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

IYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
1.50%2.04%1.94%2.27%2.55%2.51%2.60%2.36%2.15%3.54%2.27%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYZ and IBIC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYZ has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYZ dropped -77.11% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, IYZ leads with 59.79% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IYZ has performed better with a 59.79% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYZ.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.50% for IYZ.

IYZ is categorized as Communications Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IYZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYZ and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 3.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYZ and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer