PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYZ vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYZ vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYZ achieves a 32.03% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IYZ has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 6.28%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


IYZ

1D
-2.96%
1M
4.94%
YTD
32.03%
6M
38.73%
1Y
59.79%
3Y*
30.34%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
6.28%

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYZ vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
32.03%29.28%20.53%3.90%-30.29%11.69%4.13%16.14%-8.59%-11.86%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IYZ and ACWI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.72

The correlation between IYZ and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYZ vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYZ
IYZ Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYZ vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYZACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.41

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.54

3.01

+6.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.08

13.53

+18.56

IYZ vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYZ Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYZ and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYZACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

2.29

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.71

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.75

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.43

-0.35

Drawdowns

IYZ vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYZ drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYZ and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYZACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.11%

-56.00%

-21.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-9.73%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-16.55%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.74%

-26.42%

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

-33.53%

-6.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-0.83%

-2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-8.61%

-31.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.16%

-0.29%

Volatility

IYZ vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.93%. This indicates that IYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYZACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

3.93%

+3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.76%

10.29%

+4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.95%

12.78%

+5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.75%

16.05%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

17.11%

+2.14%

IYZ vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYZ vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
1.50%2.04%1.94%2.27%2.55%2.51%2.60%2.36%2.15%3.54%2.27%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYZ and ACWI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYZ has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYZ dropped -77.11% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 6.28% for IYZ. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 6.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYZ.

IYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

IYZ is categorized as Communications Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. IYZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYZ and 0.32% for ACWI.

IYZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYZ and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer