PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYR vs. SRET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYR vs. SRET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYR achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than SRET's 3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IYR has outperformed SRET with an annualized return of 5.47%, while SRET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return.


IYR

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
6.81%
6M
5.67%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
5.47%

SRET

1D
-1.07%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
3.74%
6M
4.08%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
1.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYR vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
6.81%3.38%4.41%11.89%-25.51%38.74%-5.23%28.21%-4.33%9.31%
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
3.74%18.09%-1.55%9.85%-18.24%14.00%-36.63%22.77%-5.52%17.80%

Correlation

The correlation between IYR and SRET is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2015

0.75

The correlation between IYR and SRET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYR vs. SRET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYR
SRET

Real Estate

97.9%
92.5%

Basic Materials

1.3%

-

Communication Services

0.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

3.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

IYR
97.9%
SRET
92.5%

Basic Materials

IYR
1.3%
SRET

-

Communication Services

IYR
0.6%
SRET

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYR

-

SRET

-

Consumer Defensive

IYR

-

SRET

-

Energy

IYR

-

SRET

-

Financial Services

IYR

-

SRET
3.1%

Healthcare

IYR

-

SRET

-

Industrials

IYR

-

SRET

-

Technology

IYR

-

SRET

-

Utilities

IYR

-

SRET

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYR vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYR
IYR Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IYR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IYR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYR Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SRET
SRET Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SRET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRET Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SRET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRET Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYR vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYRSRETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.58

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

6.61

-3.51

IYR vs. SRET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYR Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the SRET Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYR and SRET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYRSRETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.32

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.07

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.04

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.06

+0.26

Drawdowns

IYR vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYR drawdown since its inception was -74.13%, which is greater than SRET's maximum drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYR and SRET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYRSRETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.13%

-66.98%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-9.48%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-18.87%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.75%

-30.56%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

-66.98%

+24.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-24.23%

+20.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-22.49%

+9.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.27%

+0.46%

Volatility

IYR vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) at 3.11%. This indicates that IYR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYRSRETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

3.11%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

8.72%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

11.36%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

16.50%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

24.58%

-4.27%

IYR vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYR has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYR vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison

IYR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than SRET's 8.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
2.25%2.48%2.57%2.75%2.92%2.06%2.58%3.05%3.53%3.73%4.41%3.92%
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
8.78%7.98%8.72%7.21%8.30%6.33%8.88%7.83%8.54%8.20%8.08%7.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYR and SRET have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYR has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to SRET (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYR dropped -74.13% vs SRET's -66.98%.

On 10-year performance, IYR leads with 5.47% vs 1.05% for SRET. On fees, IYR is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYR has performed better with a 5.47% return vs 1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYR is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SRET.

SRET has the higher dividend yield at 8.78%, compared with 2.25% for IYR.

IYR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYR and 0.58% for SRET.

SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYR and SRET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer