IYR vs. SRET
IYR (iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF) and SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - IYR tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index while SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYR returned 5.47%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for SRET. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYR charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SRET.
Performance
IYR vs. SRET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYR achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than SRET's 3.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IYR has outperformed SRET with an annualized return of 5.47%, while SRET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return.
IYR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
SRET
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
IYR vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | 6.81% | 3.38% | 4.41% | 11.89% | -25.51% | 38.74% | -5.23% | 28.21% | -4.33% | 9.31% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 3.74% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 22.77% | -5.52% | 17.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYR and SRET is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2015 | 0.75 |
The correlation between IYR and SRET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IYR vs. SRET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYR
SRET
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IYR
SRET
Basic Materials
IYR
SRET
-
Communication Services
IYR
SRET
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYR
-
SRET
-
Consumer Defensive
IYR
-
SRET
-
Energy
IYR
-
SRET
-
Financial Services
IYR
-
SRET
Healthcare
IYR
-
SRET
-
Industrials
IYR
-
SRET
-
Technology
IYR
-
SRET
-
Utilities
IYR
-
SRET
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYR vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank
IYR
SRET
IYR vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYR | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.23 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.58 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 6.61 | -3.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYR | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.32 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.07 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.04 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.06 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
IYR vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYR drawdown since its inception was -74.13%, which is greater than SRET's maximum drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYR and SRET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYR | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.13% | -66.98% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.54% | -9.48% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.52% | -18.87% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.75% | -30.56% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | -66.98% | +24.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -24.23% | +20.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -22.49% | +9.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.27% | +0.46% |
Volatility
IYR vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) at 3.11%. This indicates that IYR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYR | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 3.11% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 8.72% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 11.36% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 16.50% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 24.58% | -4.27% |
IYR vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYR has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYR vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison
IYR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than SRET's 8.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | 2.25% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 2.75% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.58% | 3.05% | 3.53% | 3.73% | 4.41% | 3.92% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 8.78% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYR and SRET have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYR has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to SRET (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYR dropped -74.13% vs SRET's -66.98%.
On 10-year performance, IYR leads with 5.47% vs 1.05% for SRET. On fees, IYR is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYR has performed better with a 5.47% return vs 1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYR is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SRET.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 8.78%, compared with 2.25% for IYR.
IYR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYR and 0.58% for SRET.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYR and SRET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer