IYR vs. SLV
IYR (iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IYR is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYR returned 5.47%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYR charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IYR vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYR achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IYR has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 5.47%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
IYR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
IYR vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | 6.81% | 3.38% | 4.41% | 11.89% | -25.51% | 38.74% | -5.23% | 28.21% | -4.33% | 9.31% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYR and SLV is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.17 |
IYR vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYR
SLV
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IYR
SLV
-
Basic Materials
IYR
SLV
Communication Services
IYR
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYR
-
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
IYR
-
SLV
-
Energy
IYR
-
SLV
-
Financial Services
IYR
-
SLV
-
Healthcare
IYR
-
SLV
-
Industrials
IYR
-
SLV
-
Technology
IYR
-
SLV
-
Utilities
IYR
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYR vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IYR
SLV
IYR vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.35 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 2.62 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 5.64 | -2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.89 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.58 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.49 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.25 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
IYR vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYR drawdown since its inception was -74.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYR and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.13% | -76.28% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.54% | -42.45% | +33.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.52% | -42.45% | +24.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.75% | -42.45% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | -42.81% | +0.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -37.30% | +33.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -44.67% | +31.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 19.67% | -16.94% |
Volatility
IYR vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) is 3.69%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IYR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYR | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 16.30% | -12.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 58.31% | -48.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 58.90% | -45.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 36.15% | -17.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 31.84% | -11.53% |
IYR vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYR has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYR vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IYR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | 2.25% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 2.75% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.58% | 3.05% | 3.53% | 3.73% | 4.41% | 3.92% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYR and SLV have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IYR (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYR dropped -74.13% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 5.47% for IYR. On fees, IYR is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYR has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYR is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IYR has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IYR is categorized as REIT, while SLV is Silver. IYR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYR and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYR and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer