IYR vs. IAU
IYR (iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IYR is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYR returned 5.47%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for IAU. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYR charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
IYR vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYR achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, IYR has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 5.47%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.
IYR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 6.81%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
IAU
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
IYR vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | 6.81% | 3.38% | 4.41% | 11.89% | -25.51% | 38.74% | -5.23% | 28.21% | -4.33% | 9.31% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 2.98% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYR and IAU is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005 | 0.10 |
IYR vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYR
IAU
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IYR
IAU
Basic Materials
IYR
IAU
-
Communication Services
IYR
IAU
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYR
-
IAU
-
Consumer Defensive
IYR
-
IAU
-
Energy
IYR
-
IAU
-
Financial Services
IYR
-
IAU
-
Healthcare
IYR
-
IAU
-
Industrials
IYR
-
IAU
-
Technology
IYR
-
IAU
-
Utilities
IYR
-
IAU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYR vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
IYR
IAU
IYR vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYR | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.24 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 1.69 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 4.19 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYR | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 1.23 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 1.03 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.84 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.62 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
IYR vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYR drawdown since its inception was -74.13%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYR and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYR | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.13% | -45.14% | -28.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.54% | -19.18% | +10.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.52% | -19.18% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.75% | -20.93% | -12.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.32% | -21.82% | -20.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -17.70% | +13.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -15.96% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 7.71% | -4.98% |
Volatility
IYR vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) is 3.69%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IYR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYR | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 5.50% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 23.02% | -13.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 26.42% | -13.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 17.95% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 15.90% | +4.41% |
IYR vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYR has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYR vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
IYR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | 2.25% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 2.75% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.58% | 3.05% | 3.53% | 3.73% | 4.41% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYR and IAU have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to IYR (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYR dropped -74.13% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 5.47% for IYR. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IYR has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYR.
IYR has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
IYR is categorized as REIT, while IAU is Gold. IYR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYR and 0.25% for IAU.
IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYR and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer