PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYR vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYR vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYR achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IYR has outperformed FAAR with an annualized return of 5.46%, while FAAR has yielded a comparatively lower 4.74% annualized return.


IYR

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
7.81%
6M
8.82%
1Y
8.72%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
2.39%
10Y*
5.46%

FAAR

1D
0.31%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
20.28%
6M
20.86%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
10.85%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
4.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYR vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
7.81%3.38%4.41%11.89%-25.51%38.74%-5.23%28.21%-4.33%9.31%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
20.28%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%12.34%8.60%-1.28%-9.17%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IYR and FAAR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYR vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYR
IYR Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IYR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IYR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYR Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYR vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYRFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.34

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

4.72

-3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

14.40

-11.22

IYR vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYR Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYR and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYR vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYR drawdown since its inception was -74.13%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYR and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYRFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.13%

-18.03%

-56.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-5.68%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-11.54%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.75%

-18.03%

-15.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

-18.03%

-24.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-5.39%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-7.83%

-5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.87%

+0.88%

Volatility

IYR vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 2.50%. This indicates that IYR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYRFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

2.50%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

9.71%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

13.36%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

12.95%

+5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.35%

11.53%

+8.82%

IYR vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYR vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

IYR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than FAAR's 9.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.57%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%0.00%0.00%
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
2.25%2.48%2.57%2.75%2.92%2.06%2.58%3.05%3.53%3.73%4.41%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYR and FAAR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYR has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to FAAR (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYR dropped -74.13% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

On 10-year performance, IYR leads with 5.46% vs 4.74% for FAAR. On fees, IYR is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYR has performed better with a 5.46% return vs 4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYR is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 2.25% for IYR.

IYR is categorized as REIT, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYR and 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYR and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer