PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYR vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYR vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYR achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, IYR has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 5.47%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


IYR

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
6.81%
6M
5.67%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
5.47%

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYR vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
6.81%3.38%4.41%11.89%-25.51%38.74%-5.23%28.21%-4.33%9.31%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IYR and ACWI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between IYR and ACWI has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IYR vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYR
ACWI

Real Estate

97.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.3%
3.7%

Communication Services

0.6%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.0%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

16.1%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Technology

-

29.4%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Real Estate

IYR
97.9%
ACWI
1.8%

Basic Materials

IYR
1.3%
ACWI
3.7%

Communication Services

IYR
0.6%
ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IYR

-

ACWI
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

IYR

-

ACWI
5.0%

Energy

IYR

-

ACWI
4.2%

Financial Services

IYR

-

ACWI
16.1%

Healthcare

IYR

-

ACWI
8.1%

Industrials

IYR

-

ACWI
10.9%

Technology

IYR

-

ACWI
29.4%

Utilities

IYR

-

ACWI
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYR vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYR
IYR Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IYR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IYR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYR Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYR vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYRACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.41

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

3.01

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

13.53

-10.43

IYR vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYR Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYR and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYRACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

2.29

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.71

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.75

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.43

-0.10

Drawdowns

IYR vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYR drawdown since its inception was -74.13%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYR and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYRACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.13%

-56.00%

-18.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-9.73%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-16.55%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.75%

-26.42%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.32%

-33.53%

-8.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-0.83%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-8.61%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.16%

+0.57%

Volatility

IYR vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (IYR) is 3.69%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that IYR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYRACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

3.93%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

10.29%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

12.78%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

16.05%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

17.11%

+3.20%

IYR vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYR has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYR vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IYR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
IYR
iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF
2.25%2.48%2.57%2.75%2.92%2.06%2.58%3.05%3.53%3.73%4.41%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYR and ACWI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IYR (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYR dropped -74.13% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 5.47% for IYR. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, IYR has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYR.

IYR has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

IYR is categorized as REIT, while ACWI is Global Equities. IYR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYR and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYR and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer