PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYJ vs. PRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYJ vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYJ achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 41.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IYJ has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 12.31%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.51% annualized return.


IYJ

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.44%
YTD
5.81%
6M
7.55%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
12.31%

PRN

1D
0.59%
1M
6.86%
YTD
41.80%
6M
45.38%
1Y
65.12%
3Y*
36.96%
5Y*
20.18%
10Y*
18.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYJ vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
5.81%11.94%17.82%19.94%-13.53%17.02%17.37%32.27%-11.69%23.98%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
41.80%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IYJ and PRN is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.87

The correlation between IYJ and PRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYJ vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYJ
PRN

Industrials

66.6%
79.3%

Financial Services

17.0%
0.1%

Technology

6.6%
19.4%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.8%

Utilities

3.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
1.2%

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

IYJ
66.6%
PRN
79.3%

Financial Services

IYJ
17.0%
PRN
0.1%

Technology

IYJ
6.6%
PRN
19.4%

Basic Materials

IYJ
4.0%
PRN
1.8%

Utilities

IYJ
3.6%
PRN

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYJ
1.7%
PRN
1.2%

Healthcare

IYJ
0.4%
PRN

-

Communication Services

IYJ

-

PRN

-

Consumer Defensive

IYJ

-

PRN

-

Energy

IYJ

-

PRN
1.6%

Real Estate

IYJ

-

PRN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYJ vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYJ
IYJ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYJ vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYJPRNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

2.29

-1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

2.86

-1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.37

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

4.63

-3.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.10

15.45

-11.34

IYJ vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYJ and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYJPRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.29

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.81

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.77

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.52

-0.15

Drawdowns

IYJ vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYJ drawdown since its inception was -61.97%, roughly equal to the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYJ and PRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYJPRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.97%

-59.88%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-14.15%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-30.78%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

-34.84%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

-36.27%

-3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.24%

-0.47%

-2.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.21%

-10.84%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

4.23%

-1.09%

Volatility

IYJ vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) is 4.05%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that IYJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYJPRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

10.95%

-6.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

23.22%

-11.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.05%

28.66%

-13.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

25.03%

-6.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.87%

24.17%

-4.30%

IYJ vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYJ has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYJ vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

IYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than PRN's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
0.78%0.83%0.88%1.05%1.05%0.76%1.01%1.32%1.43%1.29%1.38%1.53%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.11%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYJ and PRN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to IYJ (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYJ dropped -61.97% vs PRN's -59.88%.

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 18.51% vs 12.31% for IYJ. On fees, IYJ is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 18.51% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYJ is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

IYJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.11% for PRN.

IYJ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while PRN is Momentum. IYJ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYJ and 0.60% for PRN.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYJ and PRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer