IYJ vs. HVAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IYJ (iShares U.S. Industrials ETF) and HVAC (AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. IYJ is passively managed, while HVAC is actively managed. Over the past year, IYJ returned 12.86% vs 59.65% for HVAC. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYJ charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for HVAC.

Performance

IYJ vs. HVAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYJ achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than HVAC's 36.48% return.

IYJ

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 5.81%
• 6M: 7.55%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 16.95%
• 5Y*: 7.87%
• 10Y*: 12.31%

HVAC

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: 6.24%
• YTD: 36.48%
• 6M: 32.88%
• 1Y: 59.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYJ vs. HVAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IYJ iShares U.S. Industrials ETF	5.81%	7.52%
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF	36.48%	24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IYJ and HVAC is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.79

The correlation between IYJ and HVAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYJ vs. HVAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IYJ	HVAC
Industrials	66.6%	67.0%
Financial Services	17.0%	-
Technology	6.6%	16.9%
Basic Materials	4.0%	-
Utilities	3.6%	7.4%
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	4.5%
Healthcare	0.4%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

IYJ vs. HVAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYJ

IYJ Risk / Return Rank: 25
IYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
IYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
IYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
IYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
IYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 28

HVAC

HVAC Risk / Return Rank: 68
HVAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
HVAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
HVAC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HVAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
HVAC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYJ vs. HVAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IYJ	HVAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	2.19	-1.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	2.75	-1.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.36	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	4.04	-2.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	14.29	-10.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IYJ vs. HVAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the HVAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYJ and HVAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IYJ	HVAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	2.19	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	1.67	-1.30

Drawdowns

IYJ vs. HVAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYJ drawdown since its inception was -61.97%, which is greater than HVAC's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYJ and HVAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IYJ	HVAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.97%	-21.22%	-40.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.39%	-14.83%	+3.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.24%	-0.60%	-2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.21%	-3.95%	-7.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.14%	4.19%	-1.05%

Volatility

IYJ vs. HVAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) is 4.05%, while AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) has a volatility of 11.09%. This indicates that IYJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HVAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IYJ	HVAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	11.09%	-7.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	22.96%	-11.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.05%	27.43%	-12.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.04%	29.39%	-11.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.87%	29.39%	-9.52%

IYJ vs. HVAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYJ has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than HVAC's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYJ vs. HVAC - Dividend Comparison

IYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than HVAC's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IYJ iShares U.S. Industrials ETF	0.78%	0.83%	0.88%	1.05%	1.05%	0.76%	1.01%	1.32%	1.43%	1.29%	1.38%	1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IYJ and HVAC in my portfolio?

IYJ and HVAC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IYJ or HVAC?

HVAC has higher volatility (11.09%) compared to IYJ (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYJ dropped -61.97% vs HVAC's -21.22%.

Which ETF is better, IYJ or HVAC?

On 1-year performance, HVAC leads with 59.65% vs 12.86% for IYJ. On fees, IYJ is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IYJ or HVAC?

Over the 1-year period, HVAC has performed better with a 59.65% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IYJ or HVAC?

IYJ is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HVAC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IYJ or HVAC?

IYJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.14% for HVAC.

What is the main difference between IYJ and HVAC?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYJ and 1.00% for HVAC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HVAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.