PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYJ vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYJ vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYJ achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -2.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYJ having a 12.54% annualized return and GLD not far behind at 12.15%.


IYJ

1D
0.68%
1M
1.18%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.77%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
12.54%

GLD

1D
0.06%
1M
-9.52%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYJ vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
7.60%11.94%17.82%19.94%-13.53%17.02%17.37%32.27%-11.69%23.98%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.47%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IYJ and GLD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.06

The correlation between IYJ and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (10 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYJ vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYJ
IYJ Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYJ vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYJGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.18

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

0.98

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

2.81

+1.63

IYJ vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYJ and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYJ vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYJ drawdown since its inception was -61.97%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYJ and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYJGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.97%

-45.56%

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-24.46%

+13.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-24.46%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

-24.46%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

-24.46%

-15.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-22.05%

+20.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.20%

-16.16%

+4.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

8.49%

-5.32%

Volatility

IYJ vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) is 5.76%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 7.79%. This indicates that IYJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYJGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

7.79%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

24.10%

-11.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

27.37%

-11.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.14%

18.22%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

16.08%

+3.83%

IYJ vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYJ has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYJ vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

IYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYJ
iShares U.S. Industrials ETF
0.77%0.83%0.88%1.05%1.05%0.76%1.01%1.32%1.43%1.29%1.38%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYJ and GLD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to IYJ (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYJ dropped -61.97% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, IYJ leads with 12.54% vs 12.15% for GLD. On fees, IYJ is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYJ has performed better with a 12.54% return vs 12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYJ is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

IYJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

IYJ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while GLD is Gold. IYJ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYJ and 0.40% for GLD.

IYJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYJ and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer