PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYH vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYH vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYH achieves a -1.29% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 18.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYH having a 9.38% annualized return and REMX not far behind at 9.04%.


IYH

1D
-0.28%
1M
6.02%
YTD
-1.29%
6M
0.79%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
6.60%
5Y*
4.95%
10Y*
9.38%

REMX

1D
-1.32%
1M
-17.82%
YTD
18.26%
6M
21.26%
1Y
129.60%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
9.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYH vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF
-1.29%13.16%2.99%2.14%-4.46%23.41%15.56%20.80%5.80%22.27%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
18.26%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IYH and REMX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2010

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between IYH and REMX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IYH vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYH
REMX

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IYH
100.0%
REMX

-

Basic Materials

IYH

-

REMX
100.0%

Communication Services

IYH

-

REMX

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYH

-

REMX

-

Consumer Defensive

IYH

-

REMX

-

Energy

IYH

-

REMX

-

Financial Services

IYH

-

REMX

-

Industrials

IYH

-

REMX

-

Real Estate

IYH

-

REMX

-

Technology

IYH

-

REMX

-

Utilities

IYH

-

REMX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYH vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYH vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYHREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.37

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

5.58

-4.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.45

15.61

-12.15

IYH vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYH Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYH and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYHREMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.67

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.07

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.25

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

-0.10

+0.53

Drawdowns

IYH vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYH drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYH and REMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYHREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-90.20%

+47.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-23.35%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-62.11%

+44.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-73.34%

+55.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-73.34%

+44.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.56%

-59.97%

+55.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.96%

-66.86%

+57.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

8.34%

-3.91%

Volatility

IYH vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) is 4.97%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 14.39%. This indicates that IYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYHREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

14.39%

-9.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

35.93%

-25.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.03%

48.92%

-33.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

40.41%

-25.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

37.04%

-20.30%

IYH vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYH has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYH vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than REMX's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF
1.26%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.49%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYH and REMX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (14.39%) compared to IYH (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYH dropped -43.12% vs REMX's -90.20%.

On 10-year performance, IYH leads with 9.38% vs 9.04% for REMX. On fees, IYH is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYH has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYH is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.26% for IYH.

IYH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while REMX is Materials. IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IYH and 0.59% for REMX.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYH and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer