PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IYH vs. IXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IYH vs. IXC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYH returned 9.52%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for IXC. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYH charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.

Performance

IYH vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYH achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 29.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IYH has underperformed IXC with an annualized return of 9.52%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.05% annualized return.

IYH

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.45%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
0.07%
1Y
14.13%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
9.52%

IXC

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
29.17%
6M
28.84%
1Y
38.93%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYH vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		-0.65%13.16%2.99%2.14%-4.46%23.41%15.56%20.80%5.80%22.27%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		29.17%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IYH and IXC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2001

0.42

The correlation between IYH and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYH vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IYH
IXC

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IYH
100.0%
IXC

-

Basic Materials

IYH

-

IXC

-

Communication Services

IYH

-

IXC

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYH

-

IXC

-

Consumer Defensive

IYH

-

IXC

-

Energy

IYH

-

IXC
100.0%

Financial Services

IYH

-

IXC

-

Industrials

IYH

-

IXC

-

Real Estate

IYH

-

IXC

-

Technology

IYH

-

IXC

-

Utilities

IYH

-

IXC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF

iShares Global Energy ETF

Often compared with IYH:
IYH vs. VHTIYH vs. XLVIYH vs. SPYIYH vs. IYEIYH vs. BMEDIYH vs. IFRAIYH vs. IBB
Often compared with IXC:
IXC vs. XLEIXC vs. VDEIXC vs. IYEIXC vs. OIHIXC vs. IUES.LIXC vs. DDMIXC vs. XDW0.DE

Return for Risk

IYH vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYH vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IYHIXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.94
2.08

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.52
2.70

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

4.05

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

11.55

-8.37

IYH vs. IXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYH Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the IXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYH and IXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYH vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYH drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYH and IXC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IYHIXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-67.88%

+24.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-9.66%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-19.06%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-24.93%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-64.16%

+35.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-7.04%

+3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.96%

-17.47%

+8.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

3.38%

+1.08%

Volatility

IYH vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) is 4.94%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that IYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IYHIXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

6.44%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

15.63%

-4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

18.79%

-3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

23.53%

-8.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

26.84%

-10.10%

IYH vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYH has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYH vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than IXC's 2.85% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		2.85%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		1.25%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

IYH and IXC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to IYH (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYH dropped -43.12% vs IXC's -67.88%.

On 10-year performance, IXC leads with 10.05% vs 9.52% for IYH. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXC has performed better with a 10.05% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.25% for IYH.

IYH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IYH and 0.40% for IXC.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYH and IXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer