PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IYH vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IYH vs. EMXC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IYH returned 4.89%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for EMXC. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYH charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.

Performance

IYH vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYH achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 37.25% return.

IYH

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.45%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
0.07%
1Y
14.13%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
9.52%

EMXC

1D
0.55%
1M
3.75%
YTD
37.25%
6M
42.23%
1Y
65.26%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYH vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		-0.65%13.16%2.99%2.14%-4.46%23.41%15.56%20.80%5.80%3.97%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF		37.25%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-12.96%7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IYH and EMXC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.43

The correlation between IYH and EMXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IYH vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IYH
EMXC

Healthcare

100.0%
2.2%

Basic Materials

-

6.8%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.9%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

19.6%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

45.0%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Healthcare

IYH
100.0%
EMXC
2.2%

Basic Materials

IYH

-

EMXC
6.8%

Communication Services

IYH

-

EMXC
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IYH

-

EMXC
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

IYH

-

EMXC
2.9%

Energy

IYH

-

EMXC
4.2%

Financial Services

IYH

-

EMXC
19.6%

Industrials

IYH

-

EMXC
8.3%

Real Estate

IYH

-

EMXC
1.0%

Technology

IYH

-

EMXC
45.0%

Utilities

IYH

-

EMXC
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

Often compared with IYH:
IYH vs. VHTIYH vs. XLVIYH vs. SPYIYH vs. IYEIYH vs. BMEDIYH vs. IFRAIYH vs. IBB
Often compared with EMXC:
EMXC vs. XCEMEMXC vs. IEMGEMXC vs. VWOEMXC vs. EEMEMXC vs. SPEMEMXC vs. VEXCEMXC vs. VNM

Return for Risk

IYH vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYH vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IYHEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.94
2.74

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.52
3.35

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.50

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

4.55

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

17.51

-14.33

IYH vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYH Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYH and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYH vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYH drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, roughly equal to the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYH and EMXC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IYHEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-42.81%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-14.41%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-19.12%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-28.91%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-4.12%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.96%

-10.17%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

3.74%

+0.72%

Volatility

IYH vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) is 4.94%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that IYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IYHEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

12.83%

-7.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

21.90%

-11.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

23.90%

-8.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

18.00%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

20.07%

-3.33%

IYH vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYH has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYH vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than EMXC's 2.05% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF		2.05%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		1.25%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

IYH and EMXC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXC has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to IYH (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYH dropped -43.12% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 12.14% vs 4.89% for IYH. On fees, IYH is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYH is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.25% for IYH.

IYH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IYH and 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYH and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer