IYH vs. BTEC
IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IYH tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index while BTEC tracks the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. Both are passively managed. IYH charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.
Performance
IYH vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IYH
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- -4.19%
- 6M
- -4.54%
- 1Y
- 13.08%
- 3Y*
- 5.48%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
BTEC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYH vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -5.29% |
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% |
IYH vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYH
BTEC
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IYH
BTEC
Basic Materials
IYH
-
BTEC
-
Communication Services
IYH
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYH
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Defensive
IYH
-
BTEC
-
Energy
IYH
-
BTEC
-
Financial Services
IYH
-
BTEC
-
Industrials
IYH
-
BTEC
Real Estate
IYH
-
BTEC
-
Technology
IYH
-
BTEC
-
Utilities
IYH
-
BTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYH vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank
IYH
BTEC
IYH vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYH | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.97 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYH | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | — | — |
Drawdowns
IYH vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYH drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYH and BTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYH | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | 0.00% | -43.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.36% | 0.00% | -7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.96% | 0.00% | -8.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | — | — |
Volatility
IYH vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYH | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.74% | 0.00% | +14.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 0.00% | +14.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 0.00% | +16.72% |
IYH vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYH has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYH vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison
IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.30% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
IYH has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.
IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IYH and 0.42% for BTEC.
Find the right allocation for IYH and BTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer