PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYE vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYE vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Energy ETF (IYE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYE achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, IYE has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 9.00%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.


IYE

1D
1.33%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
31.90%
6M
29.37%
1Y
44.08%
3Y*
17.12%
5Y*
19.52%
10Y*
9.00%

IWM

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.83%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYE vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYE
iShares U.S. Energy ETF
31.90%7.33%6.06%-2.21%60.21%53.42%-33.49%10.03%-19.37%-1.80%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
17.07%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IYE and IWM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2000

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between IYE and IWM has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IYE vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYE
IWM

Energy

98.9%
6.0%

Technology

1.1%
19.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.5%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.1%

Financial Services

-

15.8%

Healthcare

-

15.8%

Industrials

-

17.1%

Real Estate

-

5.7%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Energy

IYE
98.9%
IWM
6.0%

Technology

IYE
1.1%
IWM
19.5%

Basic Materials

IYE

-

IWM
4.5%

Communication Services

IYE

-

IWM
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IYE

-

IWM
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

IYE

-

IWM
2.1%

Financial Services

IYE

-

IWM
15.8%

Healthcare

IYE

-

IWM
15.8%

Industrials

IYE

-

IWM
17.1%

Real Estate

IYE

-

IWM
5.7%

Utilities

IYE

-

IWM
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYE vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYE
IYE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IYE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IYE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYE vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Energy ETF (IYE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYEIWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

3.56

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

12.64

-1.65

IYE vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYE Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYE and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYEIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.05

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.27

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.48

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.37

-0.10

Drawdowns

IYE vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYE drawdown since its inception was -73.74%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYE and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYEIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.74%

-59.05%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-11.03%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.37%

-27.50%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-31.91%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.59%

-41.13%

-27.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.77%

-1.49%

-4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.36%

-10.77%

-8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

3.10%

+0.92%

Volatility

IYE vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Energy ETF (IYE) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.75%. This indicates that IYE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYEIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

5.75%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

13.53%

+2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.99%

19.20%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.71%

22.52%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.52%

23.04%

+6.48%

IYE vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYE has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYE vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IYE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.88%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%
IYE
iShares U.S. Energy ETF
2.13%2.85%2.75%2.99%3.37%2.98%4.75%6.60%3.16%2.66%2.11%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYE and IWM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYE has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to IWM (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYE dropped -73.74% vs IWM's -59.05%.

On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 10.93% vs 9.00% for IYE. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYE.

IYE has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

IYE is categorized as Energy Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IYE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYE and 0.19% for IWM.

IYE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYE and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer