PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXN vs. TECL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXN vs. TECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 41.18% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 125.87% return. Over the past 10 years, IXN has underperformed TECL with an annualized return of 25.57%, while TECL has yielded a comparatively higher 54.49% annualized return.


IXN

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.36%
YTD
41.18%
6M
41.72%
1Y
74.57%
3Y*
36.05%
5Y*
23.25%
10Y*
25.57%

TECL

1D
-2.99%
1M
73.10%
YTD
125.87%
6M
118.69%
1Y
267.85%
3Y*
80.64%
5Y*
43.44%
10Y*
54.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXN vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
41.18%25.25%24.84%52.98%-29.86%29.58%43.62%47.88%-5.44%41.23%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
125.87%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IXN and TECL is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2008

0.98

The correlation between IXN and TECL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXN vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXN
TECL

Technology

99.3%
20.4%

Industrials

0.2%
0.0%

Energy

0.1%
0.0%

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IXN
99.3%
TECL
20.4%

Industrials

IXN
0.2%
TECL
0.0%

Energy

IXN
0.1%
TECL
0.0%

Healthcare

IXN
0.1%
TECL

-

Real Estate

IXN
0.0%
TECL

-

Basic Materials

IXN

-

TECL

-

Communication Services

IXN

-

TECL

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXN

-

TECL

-

Consumer Defensive

IXN

-

TECL

-

Financial Services

IXN

-

TECL

-

Utilities

IXN

-

TECL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXN vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXN vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXNTECLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.48

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

5.79

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.73

16.63

+2.10

IXN vs. TECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXN Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is comparable to the TECL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXN and TECL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXNTECLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

4.35

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.59

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.76

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.76

-0.22

Drawdowns

IXN vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, smaller than the maximum TECL drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and TECL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXNTECLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-77.96%

+22.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-46.58%

+32.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.55%

-66.58%

+41.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-77.96%

+41.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

-77.96%

+41.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-2.99%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-18.38%

+7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

16.19%

-12.20%

Volatility

IXN vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is 7.95%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 20.70%. This indicates that IXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXNTECLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

20.70%

-12.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.85%

49.83%

-31.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

62.17%

-40.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.84%

74.09%

-49.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.40%

72.35%

-47.95%

IXN vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXN vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison

IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than TECL's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
0.74%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
3.15%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IXN and TECL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TECL has higher volatility (20.70%) compared to IXN (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs TECL's -77.96%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 54.49% vs 25.57% for IXN. On fees, IXN is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXN has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 54.49% return vs 25.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXN is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for TECL.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.74% for IXN.

IXN is categorized as Technology Equities, while TECL is Leveraged Equities. IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.91% for TECL.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 3.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXN and TECL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer