IXN vs. LIN
IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while LIN (Linde plc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, IXN returned 21.51%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for LIN. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IXN vs. LIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly higher than LIN's 23.59% return.
IXN
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 33.08%
- 6M
- 35.17%
- 1Y
- 62.93%
- 3Y*
- 32.38%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 25.03%
LIN
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 26.61%
- 1Y
- 13.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- —
IXN vs. LIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 33.08% | 25.25% | 24.84% | 52.98% | -29.86% | 29.58% | 43.62% | 47.88% | -17.29% |
LIN Linde plc | 23.59% | 3.22% | 3.18% | 27.66% | -4.39% | 33.39% | 25.88% | 39.04% | -5.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXN and LIN is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IXN and LIN has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXN vs. LIN — Risk / Return Rank
IXN
LIN
IXN vs. LIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Linde plc (LIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXN | LIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.13 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.39 | 0.67 | +3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 1.89 | +12.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXN vs. LIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than LIN's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and LIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXN | LIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -32.59% | -23.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -19.18% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.55% | -19.18% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.30% | -22.82% | -13.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.68% | 0.00% | -6.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -5.41% | -5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 6.79% | -2.58% |
Volatility
IXN vs. LIN - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to Linde plc (LIN) at 5.57%. This indicates that IXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXN | LIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | 5.57% | +6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.45% | 13.53% | +6.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 17.24% | +6.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 20.79% | +4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 24.08% | +0.50% |
Dividends
IXN vs. LIN - Dividend Comparison
IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than LIN's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.78% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
LIN Linde plc | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXN and LIN have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXN has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to LIN (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs LIN's -32.59%.
IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXN and LIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer