PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXN vs. AIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IXN vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IXN vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
-3.18%25.25%-0.24%
AIS
VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF
14.59%58.35%-4.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a -3.18% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 14.59% return.


IXN

1D
1.69%
1M
-4.96%
YTD
-3.18%
6M
-1.58%
1Y
34.63%
3Y*
24.07%
5Y*
15.01%
10Y*
20.80%

AIS

1D
3.27%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
14.59%
6M
20.26%
1Y
99.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IXN vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IXN vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

AIS
AIS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXN vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXNAISDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

2.73

-1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

3.20

-1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

5.38

-2.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.21

18.48

-10.27

IXN vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXN Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXN and AIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXNAISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

2.73

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.43

-0.95

Correlation

The correlation between IXN and AIS is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IXN vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
1.08%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%
AIS
VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IXN vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than AIS's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and AIS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IXNAISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-32.78%

-22.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.37%

-18.75%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.48%

-7.84%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-5.97%

-5.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

5.46%

-1.11%

Volatility

IXN vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is 9.16%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 15.36%. This indicates that IXN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IXNAISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.16%

15.36%

-6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.16%

27.11%

-9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.06%

36.65%

-9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.57%

36.16%

-11.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.19%

36.16%

-11.97%