PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXN vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXN vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IXN having a 32.00% return and AIRR slightly lower at 30.41%. Over the past 10 years, IXN has outperformed AIRR with an annualized return of 24.76%, while AIRR has yielded a comparatively lower 21.61% annualized return.


IXN

1D
2.45%
1M
4.20%
YTD
32.00%
6M
30.10%
1Y
61.63%
3Y*
33.24%
5Y*
21.65%
10Y*
24.76%

AIRR

1D
0.13%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
30.41%
6M
29.32%
1Y
61.66%
3Y*
35.42%
5Y*
24.95%
10Y*
21.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXN vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
32.00%25.25%24.84%52.98%-29.86%29.58%43.62%47.88%-5.44%41.23%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
30.41%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.57%16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IXN and AIRR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014

0.57

The correlation between IXN and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXN vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXN
AIRR

Technology

99.3%
0.5%

Industrials

0.2%
84.6%

Energy

0.1%
3.8%

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

9.6%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IXN
99.3%
AIRR
0.5%

Industrials

IXN
0.2%
AIRR
84.6%

Energy

IXN
0.1%
AIRR
3.8%

Healthcare

IXN
0.1%
AIRR

-

Real Estate

IXN
0.0%
AIRR

-

Basic Materials

IXN

-

AIRR

-

Communication Services

IXN

-

AIRR

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXN

-

AIRR

-

Consumer Defensive

IXN

-

AIRR

-

Financial Services

IXN

-

AIRR
9.6%

Utilities

IXN

-

AIRR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXN vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXN vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXNAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

4.74

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.19

17.47

-2.28

IXN vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXN and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXNAIRRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.43

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.99

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.82

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.66

-0.14

Drawdowns

IXN vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than AIRR's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXNAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-42.37%

-13.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-13.09%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.55%

-27.95%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-27.95%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

-42.37%

+6.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.44%

-2.88%

-4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-7.42%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

3.54%

+0.53%

Volatility

IXN vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a higher volatility of 11.51% compared to First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) at 7.07%. This indicates that IXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXNAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.51%

7.07%

+4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.70%

20.10%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.42%

25.55%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.08%

25.33%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.53%

26.30%

-1.77%

IXN vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXN vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than AIRR's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.14%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
0.79%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXN and AIRR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXN has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to AIRR (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 24.76% vs 21.61% for AIRR. On fees, IXN is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, AIRR has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 24.76% return vs 21.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXN is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.

IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.14% for AIRR.

IXN is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.69% for AIRR.

IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXN and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer