IXJ vs. BTEC
IXJ (iShares Global Healthcare ETF) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IXJ tracks the S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index while BTEC tracks the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. Both are passively managed. IXJ charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.
Performance
IXJ vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IXJ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- 9.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.02%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
BTEC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXJ vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | -8.05% |
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% |
IXJ vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXJ
BTEC
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IXJ
BTEC
Consumer Defensive
IXJ
BTEC
-
Basic Materials
IXJ
-
BTEC
-
Communication Services
IXJ
-
BTEC
-
Consumer Cyclical
IXJ
-
BTEC
-
Energy
IXJ
-
BTEC
-
Financial Services
IXJ
-
BTEC
-
Industrials
IXJ
-
BTEC
Real Estate
IXJ
-
BTEC
-
Technology
IXJ
-
BTEC
-
Utilities
IXJ
-
BTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXJ vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank
IXJ
BTEC
IXJ vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXJ | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXJ | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | — | — |
Drawdowns
IXJ vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXJ drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXJ and BTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXJ | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | 0.00% | -40.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.27% | 0.00% | -9.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.92% | 0.00% | -6.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | — | — |
Volatility
IXJ vs. BTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXJ | BTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 0.00% | +14.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 0.00% | +14.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 0.00% | +15.67% |
IXJ vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXJ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXJ vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison
IXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF | 1.47% | 1.40% | 1.50% | 1.38% | 1.17% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.42% | 2.11% | 1.46% | 1.73% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, BTEC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTEC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXJ.
IXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.
IXJ tracks S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXJ and 0.42% for BTEC.
Find the right allocation for IXJ and BTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer