PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IXJ.AX vs. IGB.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IXJ.AX vs. IGB.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

IXJ.AX (iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)) and IGB.AX (iShares Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXJ.AX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the iShares Global Healthcare Index, while IGB.AX is a Government Bonds fund tracking the iShares Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXJ.AX returned 9.66%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for IGB.AX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IXJ.AX vs. IGB.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX) and iShares Treasury ETF (IGB.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXJ.AX achieves a -2.02% return, which is significantly lower than IGB.AX's 1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, IXJ.AX has outperformed IGB.AX with an annualized return of 9.66%, while IGB.AX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.94% annualized return.

IXJ.AX

1D
1.59%
1M
6.23%
6M
-3.46%
YTD
-2.02%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
5.81%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
9.66%

IGB.AX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.34%
6M
0.91%
YTD
1.29%
1Y
0.77%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*
0.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXJ.AX vs. IGB.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXJ.AX
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)		-2.02%6.85%9.96%2.24%2.57%28.06%2.33%26.80%11.28%15.06%
IGB.AX
iShares Treasury ETF		1.29%2.62%1.90%3.88%-10.24%-3.27%3.68%7.38%4.73%2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IXJ.AX and IGB.AX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2012

0.03

The correlation between IXJ.AX and IGB.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)

iShares Treasury ETF

Often compared with IXJ.AX:
IXJ.AX vs. AUMF.AXIXJ.AX vs. BILL.AXIXJ.AX vs. GLDN.AXIXJ.AX vs. GLIN.AXIXJ.AX vs. ILB.AXIXJ.AX vs. IOZ.AXIXJ.AX vs. IVV.AX
Often compared with IGB.AX:
IGB.AX vs. AGVT.AXIGB.AX vs. GOVT.AXIGB.AX vs. RGB.AXIGB.AX vs. RSM.AXIGB.AX vs. VGB.AXIGB.AX vs. AUMF.AXIGB.AX vs. BILL.AX

Return for Risk

IXJ.AX vs. IGB.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IXJ.AX
IXJ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IXJ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
IGB.AX
IGB.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IGB.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGB.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGB.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IGB.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGB.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXJ.AX vs. IGB.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX) and iShares Treasury ETF (IGB.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IXJ.AXIGB.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.56
0.19

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.93
0.30

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.03

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

0.19

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

0.37

+0.67

IXJ.AX vs. IGB.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXJ.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the IGB.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXJ.AX and IGB.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXJ.AX vs. IGB.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXJ.AX drawdown since its inception was -17.30%, roughly equal to the maximum IGB.AX drawdown of -16.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXJ.AX and IGB.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IXJ.AXIGB.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.30%

-16.94%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-3.87%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-3.92%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.30%

-16.01%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.30%

-16.94%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.02%

-5.91%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-4.45%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.12%

2.05%

+6.07%

Volatility

IXJ.AX vs. IGB.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to iShares Treasury ETF (IGB.AX) at 0.87%. This indicates that IXJ.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGB.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IXJ.AXIGB.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

0.87%

+4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

2.89%

+8.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

4.01%

+10.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

5.40%

+8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

5.02%

+9.59%

Dividends

IXJ.AX vs. IGB.AX - Dividend Comparison

IXJ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than IGB.AX's 2.60% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGB.AX
iShares Treasury ETF		2.60%3.10%2.47%1.63%0.80%1.20%2.47%1.54%1.56%2.11%2.09%5.81%
IXJ.AX
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)		1.10%0.94%1.56%1.44%1.71%1.37%1.89%2.86%0.74%3.99%5.60%9.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

IXJ.AX and IGB.AX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXJ.AX is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IGB.AX is Government Bonds. IXJ.AX tracks iShares Global Healthcare Index, while IGB.AX tracks iShares Treasury Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXJ.AX and IGB.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer