PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IXJ.AX vs. IAA.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IXJ.AX vs. IAA.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

IXJ.AX (iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)) and IAA.AX (iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)) are both exchange-traded funds - IXJ.AX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the iShares Global Healthcare Index, while IAA.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares Asia 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXJ.AX returned 9.66%/yr vs 13.80%/yr for IAA.AX. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IXJ.AX vs. IAA.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU) (IAA.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXJ.AX achieves a -2.02% return, which is significantly lower than IAA.AX's 26.96% return. Over the past 10 years, IXJ.AX has underperformed IAA.AX with an annualized return of 9.66%, while IAA.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.80% annualized return.

IXJ.AX

1D
1.59%
1M
6.23%
6M
-3.46%
YTD
-2.02%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
5.81%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
9.66%

IAA.AX

1D
-6.06%
1M
-10.93%
6M
16.30%
YTD
26.96%
1Y
48.36%
3Y*
28.73%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
13.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXJ.AX vs. IAA.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXJ.AX
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)		-2.02%6.85%9.96%2.24%2.57%28.06%2.33%26.80%11.28%15.06%
IAA.AX
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)		26.96%36.38%29.68%1.92%-17.59%-5.27%22.79%22.16%-4.60%34.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IXJ.AX and IAA.AX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2009

0.24

The correlation between IXJ.AX and IAA.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)

iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)

Often compared with IXJ.AX:
IXJ.AX vs. AUMF.AXIXJ.AX vs. BILL.AXIXJ.AX vs. GLDN.AXIXJ.AX vs. GLIN.AXIXJ.AX vs. ILB.AXIXJ.AX vs. IOZ.AXIXJ.AX vs. IVV.AX
Often compared with IAA.AX:
IAA.AX vs. CORE.AXIAA.AX vs. ESGI.AXIAA.AX vs. ESTX.AXIAA.AX vs. F100.AXIAA.AX vs. GLIN.AXIAA.AX vs. HGEN.AXIAA.AX vs. HJPN.AX

Return for Risk

IXJ.AX vs. IAA.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IXJ.AX
IXJ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IXJ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXJ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
IAA.AX
IAA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IAA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXJ.AX vs. IAA.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU) (IAA.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IXJ.AXIAA.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.56
1.73

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.93
2.18

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.31

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

3.21

-2.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

11.22

-10.18

IXJ.AX vs. IAA.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXJ.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the IAA.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXJ.AX and IAA.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXJ.AX vs. IAA.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXJ.AX drawdown since its inception was -17.30%, smaller than the maximum IAA.AX drawdown of -44.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXJ.AX and IAA.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IXJ.AXIAA.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.30%

-44.90%

+27.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.30%

-14.31%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-17.55%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.30%

-39.91%

+22.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.30%

-44.90%

+27.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.02%

-14.31%

+8.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-10.35%

+6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.12%

4.18%

+3.94%

Volatility

IXJ.AX vs. IAA.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ.AX) is 5.75%, while iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU) (IAA.AX) has a volatility of 14.55%. This indicates that IXJ.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAA.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IXJ.AXIAA.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

14.55%

-8.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

24.36%

-12.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

26.53%

-11.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.62%

22.20%

-8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

19.43%

-4.82%

Dividends

IXJ.AX vs. IAA.AX - Dividend Comparison

IXJ.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than IAA.AX's 1.06% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAA.AX
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AU)		1.06%2.16%0.44%1.36%3.40%1.68%1.18%4.31%0.48%1.28%1.78%0.00%
IXJ.AX
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU)		1.10%0.94%1.56%1.44%1.71%1.37%1.89%2.86%0.74%3.99%5.60%9.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

IXJ.AX and IAA.AX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXJ.AX is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IAA.AX is Global Equities. IXJ.AX tracks iShares Global Healthcare Index, while IAA.AX tracks iShares Asia 50 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXJ.AX and IAA.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer