PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IXC vs. IYH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IXC vs. IYH

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXC returned 10.05%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for IYH. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.

Performance

IXC vs. IYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 29.17% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has outperformed IYH with an annualized return of 10.05%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.

IXC

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
29.17%
6M
28.84%
1Y
38.93%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
10.05%

IYH

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.45%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
0.07%
1Y
14.13%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		29.17%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		-0.65%13.16%2.99%2.14%-4.46%23.41%15.56%20.80%5.80%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and IYH is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2001

0.42

The correlation between IXC and IYH shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXC vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IXC
IYH

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

IXC
100.0%
IYH

-

Basic Materials

IXC

-

IYH

-

Communication Services

IXC

-

IYH

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXC

-

IYH

-

Consumer Defensive

IXC

-

IYH

-

Financial Services

IXC

-

IYH

-

Healthcare

IXC

-

IYH
100.0%

Industrials

IXC

-

IYH

-

Real Estate

IXC

-

IYH

-

Technology

IXC

-

IYH

-

Utilities

IXC

-

IYH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Energy ETF

iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF

Often compared with IXC:
IXC vs. XLEIXC vs. VDEIXC vs. IYEIXC vs. OIHIXC vs. IUES.LIXC vs. DDMIXC vs. XDW0.DE
Often compared with IYH:
IYH vs. VHTIYH vs. XLVIYH vs. SPYIYH vs. IYEIYH vs. IFRAIYH vs. BMEDIYH vs. IBB

Return for Risk

IXC vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IXCIYHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.08
0.94

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.70
1.52

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.17

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

1.33

+2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

3.18

+8.37

IXC vs. IYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the IYH Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and IYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXC vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and IYH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IXCIYHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-43.12%

-24.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-10.64%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-17.91%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-17.91%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-28.40%

-35.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.04%

-3.94%

-3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-8.96%

-8.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

4.46%

-1.08%

Volatility

IXC vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) at 4.94%. This indicates that IXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IXCIYHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

4.94%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.63%

10.64%

+4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.79%

15.10%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.53%

14.96%

+8.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.84%

16.74%

+10.10%

IXC vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXC vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than IYH's 1.25% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		2.85%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		1.25%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

IXC and IYH have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to IYH (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs IYH's -43.12%.

On 10-year performance, IXC leads with 10.05% vs 9.52% for IYH. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXC has performed better with a 10.05% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.25% for IYH.

IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.43% for IYH.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and IYH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer