IXC vs. INFR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR).
IXC and INFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2001. INFR is a passively managed fund by ClearBridge that tracks the performance of the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 14, 2022. Both IXC and INFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IXC vs. INFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IXC vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 37.40% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 4.50% |
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.41% | 24.00% | -6.23% | 5.20% | -0.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 37.40% return, which is significantly higher than INFR's 1.41% return.
IXC
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 11.19%
- YTD
- 37.40%
- 6M
- 40.78%
- 1Y
- 42.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 22.95%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
INFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 17.50%
- 3Y*
- 5.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IXC vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IXC vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank
IXC
INFR
IXC vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXC | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.26 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 1.81 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 2.51 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 9.89 | -1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXC | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.26 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.47 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between IXC and INFR is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IXC vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison
IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than INFR's 2.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.68% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 2.49% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IXC vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than INFR's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and INFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXC | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -19.28% | -48.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.03% | -8.93% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -0.70% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.57% | -5.16% | -12.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 2.27% | +3.14% |
Volatility
IXC vs. INFR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a higher volatility of 4.41% compared to ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) at 0.00%. This indicates that IXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IXC | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 0.00% | +4.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | 5.26% | +7.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.29% | 14.68% | +7.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 14.64% | +8.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.78% | 14.64% | +12.14% |