IXC vs. IHI
IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index, while IHI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXC returned 10.03%/yr vs 8.79%/yr for IHI. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IXC charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IHI.
Performance
IXC vs. IHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 30.67% return, which is significantly higher than IHI's -19.71% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has outperformed IHI with an annualized return of 10.03%, while IHI has yielded a comparatively lower 8.79% annualized return.
IXC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 30.67%
- 6M
- 30.15%
- 1Y
- 46.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
IHI
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- -19.71%
- 6M
- -19.80%
- 1Y
- -19.39%
- 3Y*
- -1.88%
- 5Y*
- -2.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
IXC vs. IHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 30.67% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -19.71% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXC and IHI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006 | 0.43 |
The correlation between IXC and IHI shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IXC vs. IHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXC
IHI
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
IXC
IHI
-
Basic Materials
IXC
-
IHI
-
Communication Services
IXC
-
IHI
-
Consumer Cyclical
IXC
-
IHI
-
Consumer Defensive
IXC
-
IHI
-
Financial Services
IXC
-
IHI
-
Healthcare
IXC
-
IHI
Industrials
IXC
-
IHI
Real Estate
IXC
-
IHI
-
Technology
IXC
-
IHI
-
Utilities
IXC
-
IHI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXC vs. IHI — Risk / Return Rank
IXC
IHI
IXC vs. IHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXC | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.82 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.82 | -0.75 | +5.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.26 | -1.85 | +16.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXC | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | -1.15 | +3.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | -0.11 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.45 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.47 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IXC vs. IHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than IHI's maximum drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and IHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXC | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -49.65% | -18.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -26.11% | +16.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -26.64% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -33.12% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.16% | -33.25% | -30.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -24.19% | +18.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.47% | -8.33% | -9.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 10.48% | -7.22% |
Volatility
IXC vs. IHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is 6.55%, while iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that IXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXC | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 7.01% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.51% | 13.06% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 17.00% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.52% | 18.99% | +4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 19.80% | +7.05% |
IXC vs. IHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IHI's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXC vs. IHI - Dividend Comparison
IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than IHI's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.45% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.82% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXC and IHI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IHI has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to IXC (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs IHI's -49.65%.
On 10-year performance, IXC leads with 10.03% vs 8.79% for IHI. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IXC has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHI is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.45% for IHI.
IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while IHI is Health & Biotech Equities. IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index, while IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXC and 0.43% for IHI.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXC and IHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer