PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXC vs. IEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXC vs. IEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 32.22% return, which is significantly lower than IEZ's 47.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has outperformed IEZ with an annualized return of 10.29%, while IEZ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.13% annualized return.


IXC

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
32.22%
6M
30.00%
1Y
48.10%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
19.64%
10Y*
10.29%

IEZ

1D
0.03%
1M
-3.54%
YTD
47.84%
6M
42.02%
1Y
85.10%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
-0.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. IEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
32.22%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%
IEZ
iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF
47.84%7.51%-8.15%4.43%65.73%15.98%-42.98%1.82%-42.47%-18.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and IEZ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2006

0.87

The correlation between IXC and IEZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXC vs. IEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXC
IEZ

Energy

100.0%
98.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

1.0%

Energy

IXC
100.0%
IEZ
98.8%

Basic Materials

IXC

-

IEZ

-

Communication Services

IXC

-

IEZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXC

-

IEZ

-

Consumer Defensive

IXC

-

IEZ

-

Financial Services

IXC

-

IEZ

-

Healthcare

IXC

-

IEZ

-

Industrials

IXC

-

IEZ
0.6%

Real Estate

IXC

-

IEZ

-

Technology

IXC

-

IEZ

-

Utilities

IXC

-

IEZ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXC vs. IEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IEZ
IEZ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. IEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXCIEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

8.29

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.10

22.60

-7.51

IXC vs. IEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the IEZ Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and IEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXCIEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

3.00

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.38

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

-0.00

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

-0.04

+0.36

Drawdowns

IXC vs. IEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, smaller than the maximum IEZ drawdown of -92.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and IEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXCIEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-92.52%

+24.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-10.32%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-40.25%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-40.25%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-88.29%

+24.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-51.21%

+46.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.48%

-48.26%

+30.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.78%

-0.58%

Volatility

IXC vs. IEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is 7.50%, while iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that IXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXCIEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

7.95%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

20.11%

-4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

28.62%

-9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.50%

36.35%

-12.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

41.56%

-14.71%

IXC vs. IEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IEZ's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXC vs. IEZ - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than IEZ's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEZ
iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF
1.18%1.87%1.76%0.97%0.65%1.20%2.07%2.28%1.81%3.42%0.91%2.40%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.79%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXC and IEZ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEZ has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to IXC (7.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs IEZ's -92.52%.

On 10-year performance, IXC leads with 10.29% vs -0.13% for IEZ. On fees, IEZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 7.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXC has performed better with a 10.29% return vs -0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXC.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.18% for IEZ.

IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index, while IEZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXC and 0.42% for IEZ.

IEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and IEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer