PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXC vs. GXPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXC vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IXC having a 32.22% return and GXPE slightly lower at 31.18%.


IXC

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
32.22%
6M
30.00%
1Y
48.10%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
19.64%
10Y*
10.29%

GXPE

1D
1.65%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
31.18%
6M
29.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
32.22%6.02%
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
31.18%4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and GXPE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXC vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXCGXPEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.10

IXC vs. GXPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXCGXPEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

2.18

-1.86

Drawdowns

IXC vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and GXPE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXCGXPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-12.37%

-55.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-6.88%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.48%

-3.21%

-14.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

Volatility

IXC vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXCGXPEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

20.42%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.50%

20.42%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.85%

20.42%

+6.43%

IXC vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXC vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than GXPE's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
0.92%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.79%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IXC and GXPE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXC.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.92% for GXPE.

IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXC and 0.15% for GXPE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and GXPE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer