PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IXC vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IXC vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - IXC tracks the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index while EINC tracks the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXC returned 9.38%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for EINC. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

IXC vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 22.29% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has underperformed EINC with an annualized return of 9.38%, while EINC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.

IXC

1D
0.44%
1M
-8.68%
YTD
22.29%
6M
23.05%
1Y
31.78%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
17.77%
10Y*
9.38%

EINC

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
25.97%
6M
25.98%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		22.29%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		25.97%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-19.85%-3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and EINC is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2012

0.72

The correlation between IXC and EINC shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXC vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IXC
EINC

Energy

100.0%
99.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

2.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

0.6%

Energy

IXC
100.0%
EINC
99.4%

Basic Materials

IXC

-

EINC

-

Communication Services

IXC

-

EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXC

-

EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

IXC

-

EINC

-

Financial Services

IXC

-

EINC

-

Healthcare

IXC

-

EINC

-

Industrials

IXC

-

EINC
2.5%

Real Estate

IXC

-

EINC

-

Technology

IXC

-

EINC

-

Utilities

IXC

-

EINC
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Energy ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with IXC:
IXC vs. XLEIXC vs. VDEIXC vs. IYEIXC vs. OIHIXC vs. IUES.LIXC vs. DDMIXC vs. XDW0.DE
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERYEINC vs. PDI

Return for Risk

IXC vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IXCEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.68
1.99

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.22
2.67

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.80

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.40

9.63

-1.23

IXC vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXC vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IXCEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-87.55%

+19.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-7.89%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-16.01%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-19.87%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-68.85%

+4.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.99%

-4.50%

-7.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.46%

-44.15%

+26.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

3.10%

+0.70%

Volatility

IXC vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) have volatilities of 6.54% and 6.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IXCEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

6.51%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

11.88%

+3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.16%

15.10%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

19.54%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.83%

25.43%

+1.40%

IXC vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXC vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than EINC's 3.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.51%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		3.11%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

IXC and EINC have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to EINC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 10-year performance, EINC leads with 12.03% vs 9.38% for IXC. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EINC has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 3.11% for IXC.

IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.45% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer