PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWVL.L vs. XEON.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWVL.L vs. XEON.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWVL.L is traded in USD, while XEON.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XEON.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWVL.L achieves a 32.97% return, which is significantly higher than XEON.DE's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, IWVL.L has outperformed XEON.DE with an annualized return of 13.36%, while XEON.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.93% annualized return.


IWVL.L

1D
3.36%
1M
6.98%
YTD
32.97%
6M
35.11%
1Y
63.09%
3Y*
28.41%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
13.36%

XEON.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
2.46%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
0.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWVL.L vs. XEON.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
32.97%40.42%5.13%19.53%-9.79%20.11%-3.67%18.13%-14.03%22.60%
XEON.DE
Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-0.38%15.43%-2.15%6.56%-5.55%-8.43%9.15%-2.59%-5.15%13.55%

Correlation

The correlation between IWVL.L and XEON.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014

0.20

The correlation between IWVL.L and XEON.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWVL.L vs. XEON.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWVL.L
IWVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

XEON.DE
XEON.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEON.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWVL.L vs. XEON.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWVL.LXEON.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.11

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.10

0.75

+6.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.90

1.90

+24.01

IWVL.L vs. XEON.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is higher than the XEON.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWVL.L and XEON.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWVL.L vs. XEON.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWVL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, roughly equal to the maximum XEON.DE drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVL.L and XEON.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWVL.LXEON.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.30%

-40.00%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-4.95%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-7.52%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-20.55%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

-25.15%

-14.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-19.51%

+17.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-21.19%

+13.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

1.95%

+0.45%

Volatility

IWVL.L vs. XEON.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Overnight Rate Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XEON.DE) at 1.21%. This indicates that IWVL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEON.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWVL.LXEON.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

1.21%

+5.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.69%

4.37%

+9.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

6.33%

+9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

7.62%

+8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

7.32%

+9.73%

IWVL.L vs. XEON.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWVL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XEON.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWVL.L vs. XEON.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWVL.L nor XEON.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IWVL.L and XEON.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEON.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEON.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWVL.L.

IWVL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XEON.DE is Bank Loan. IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while XEON.DE tracks Solactive €STR +8.5 Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWVL.L and 0.10% for XEON.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWVL.L and XEON.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer