IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L
IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and WMAT.L (SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWVL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while WMAT.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWVL.L returned 13.06%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for WMAT.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWVL.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for WMAT.L.
Performance
IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWVL.L achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly higher than WMAT.L's 15.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IWVL.L has outperformed WMAT.L with an annualized return of 13.06%, while WMAT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.25% annualized return.
IWVL.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 14.91%
- YTD
- 35.18%
- 6M
- 39.74%
- 1Y
- 67.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.59%
- 5Y*
- 16.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
WMAT.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 15.80%
- 6M
- 20.81%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 35.18% | 40.41% | 5.13% | 19.53% | -9.79% | 20.11% | -3.67% | 18.13% | -14.03% | 22.60% |
WMAT.L SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF | 15.80% | 26.36% | -5.73% | 14.40% | -10.02% | 15.63% | 20.67% | 22.51% | -17.30% | 29.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWVL.L and WMAT.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IWVL.L and WMAT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
Financial Services
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
-
Industrials
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
Healthcare
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
Communication Services
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
-
Consumer Defensive
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
Energy
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
-
Basic Materials
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
Utilities
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
-
Real Estate
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWVL.L
WMAT.L
IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWVL.L | WMAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.31 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.73 | 2.21 | +5.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.28 | 8.44 | +20.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWVL.L | WMAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35 | 1.79 | +2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.35 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.58 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.58 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWVL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, roughly equal to the maximum WMAT.L drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVL.L and WMAT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWVL.L | WMAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.30% | -38.35% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.74% | -15.51% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -21.45% | +6.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.55% | -28.08% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | -38.35% | -0.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -3.28% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.51% | -7.20% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 4.08% | -1.77% |
Volatility
IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) is 6.53%, while SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that IWVL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWVL.L | WMAT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 7.59% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | 16.38% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 19.16% | -3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 19.59% | -3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 19.48% | -2.46% |
IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWVL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WMAT.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWVL.L nor WMAT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IWVL.L and WMAT.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWVL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWVL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WMAT.L.
IWVL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while WMAT.L is Industrials Equities. IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while WMAT.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWVL.L and 0.30% for WMAT.L.
Find the right allocation for IWVL.L and WMAT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer