PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWVL.L achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly higher than WMAT.L's 15.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IWVL.L has outperformed WMAT.L with an annualized return of 13.06%, while WMAT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.25% annualized return.


IWVL.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
14.91%
YTD
35.18%
6M
39.74%
1Y
67.93%
3Y*
30.59%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
13.06%

WMAT.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.50%
YTD
15.80%
6M
20.81%
1Y
34.51%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
35.18%40.41%5.13%19.53%-9.79%20.11%-3.67%18.13%-14.03%22.60%
WMAT.L
SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF
15.80%26.36%-5.73%14.40%-10.02%15.63%20.67%22.51%-17.30%29.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IWVL.L and WMAT.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016

0.82

The correlation between IWVL.L and WMAT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWVL.L
WMAT.L

Technology

33.9%
0.6%

Financial Services

14.8%

-

Industrials

11.3%
0.4%

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
4.2%

Communication Services

7.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
0.4%

Energy

3.8%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%
94.8%

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

IWVL.L
33.9%
WMAT.L
0.6%

Financial Services

IWVL.L
14.8%
WMAT.L

-

Industrials

IWVL.L
11.3%
WMAT.L
0.4%

Healthcare

IWVL.L
8.8%
WMAT.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWVL.L
7.9%
WMAT.L
4.2%

Communication Services

IWVL.L
7.6%
WMAT.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IWVL.L
4.5%
WMAT.L
0.4%

Energy

IWVL.L
3.8%
WMAT.L

-

Basic Materials

IWVL.L
3.0%
WMAT.L
94.8%

Utilities

IWVL.L
2.5%
WMAT.L

-

Real Estate

IWVL.L
1.8%
WMAT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWVL.L
IWVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

WMAT.L
WMAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WMAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWVL.LWMAT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.31

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.73

2.21

+5.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.28

8.44

+20.83

IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.35, which is higher than the WMAT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWVL.L and WMAT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWVL.LWMAT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35

1.79

+2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.35

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.58

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.58

+0.04

Drawdowns

IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWVL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, roughly equal to the maximum WMAT.L drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVL.L and WMAT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWVL.LWMAT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.30%

-38.35%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-15.51%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-21.45%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-28.08%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

-38.35%

-0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-3.28%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-7.20%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

4.08%

-1.77%

Volatility

IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) is 6.53%, while SPDR MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF (WMAT.L) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that IWVL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWVL.LWMAT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

7.59%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

16.38%

-3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

19.16%

-3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

19.59%

-3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

19.48%

-2.46%

IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWVL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WMAT.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWVL.L vs. WMAT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWVL.L nor WMAT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IWVL.L and WMAT.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWVL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWVL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WMAT.L.

IWVL.L is categorized as Global Equities, while WMAT.L is Industrials Equities. IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while WMAT.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWVL.L and 0.30% for WMAT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWVL.L and WMAT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer