PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - IWVL.L tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index while IWDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWVL.L returned 13.06%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for IWDA.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWVL.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.L.

Performance

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWVL.L achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 9.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWVL.L having a 13.06% annualized return and IWDA.L not far ahead at 13.16%.

IWVL.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
14.91%
YTD
35.18%
6M
39.74%
1Y
67.93%
3Y*
30.59%
5Y*
16.43%
10Y*
13.06%

IWDA.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
3.71%
YTD
9.72%
6M
11.08%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		35.18%40.41%5.13%19.53%-9.79%20.11%-3.67%18.13%-14.03%22.60%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		9.72%21.03%19.11%24.27%-18.11%22.19%16.06%27.13%-9.01%22.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IWVL.L and IWDA.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2014

0.88

The correlation between IWVL.L and IWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWVL.L
IWDA.L

Technology

33.9%
32.9%

Financial Services

14.8%
14.9%

Industrials

11.3%
9.7%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
8.8%

Communication Services

7.6%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.8%

Energy

3.8%
3.9%

Basic Materials

3.0%
2.8%

Utilities

2.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.2%

Technology

IWVL.L
33.9%
IWDA.L
32.9%

Financial Services

IWVL.L
14.8%
IWDA.L
14.9%

Industrials

IWVL.L
11.3%
IWDA.L
9.7%

Healthcare

IWVL.L
8.8%
IWDA.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IWVL.L
7.9%
IWDA.L
8.8%

Communication Services

IWVL.L
7.6%
IWDA.L
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

IWVL.L
4.5%
IWDA.L
4.8%

Energy

IWVL.L
3.8%
IWDA.L
3.9%

Basic Materials

IWVL.L
3.0%
IWDA.L
2.8%

Utilities

IWVL.L
2.5%
IWDA.L
2.4%

Real Estate

IWVL.L
1.8%
IWDA.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with IWVL.L:
IWVL.L vs. VWRA.LIWVL.L vs. IWDA.ASIWVL.L vs. IWQU.LIWVL.L vs. DFIVIWVL.L vs. VOOIWVL.L vs. URTHIWVL.L vs. VT
Often compared with IWDA.L:
IWDA.L vs. VWCE.DEIWDA.L vs. SWDA.LIWDA.L vs. VWRP.LIWDA.L vs. VUAA.LIWDA.L vs. URTHIWDA.L vs. ACWI.LIWDA.L vs. SPY

Return for Risk

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWVL.L
IWVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWVL.LIWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.35
2.20

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.98
3.30

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.40

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.73

3.16

+4.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.28

13.37

+15.90

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.35, which is higher than the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWVL.L and IWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWVL.LIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35

2.20

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.75

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.83

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.79

-0.17

Drawdowns

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWVL.L drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVL.L and IWDA.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWVL.LIWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.30%

-34.11%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-8.31%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-16.94%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-25.88%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

-34.11%

-5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.53%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-4.44%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.97%

+0.34%

Volatility

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.42%. This indicates that IWVL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWVL.LIWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

3.42%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

9.20%

+3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

11.95%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

15.68%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

15.91%

+1.11%

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWVL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWVL.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWVL.L nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

IWVL.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWVL.L.

IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IWVL.L and 0.20% for IWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWVL.L and IWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer