PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWVG.L vs. VALW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWVG.L vs. VALW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) and SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWVG.L achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly higher than VALW.L's 19.01% return.


IWVG.L

1D
0.11%
1M
16.54%
YTD
35.18%
6M
37.33%
1Y
64.08%
3Y*
25.61%
5Y*
16.67%
10Y*

VALW.L

1D
-0.26%
1M
9.99%
YTD
19.01%
6M
21.67%
1Y
46.02%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWVG.L vs. VALW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
35.18%27.50%5.20%13.05%1.04%21.47%10.93%
VALW.L
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF
19.01%27.01%5.92%16.43%0.09%20.68%-18.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IWVG.L and VALW.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

0.95

The correlation between IWVG.L and VALW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWVG.L vs. VALW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWVG.L
VALW.L

Technology

33.9%
29.7%

Financial Services

14.8%
15.4%

Industrials

11.3%
12.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
8.3%

Communication Services

7.6%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.9%

Energy

3.8%
4.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.2%

Utilities

2.5%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

IWVG.L
33.9%
VALW.L
29.7%

Financial Services

IWVG.L
14.8%
VALW.L
15.4%

Industrials

IWVG.L
11.3%
VALW.L
12.4%

Healthcare

IWVG.L
8.8%
VALW.L
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IWVG.L
7.9%
VALW.L
8.3%

Communication Services

IWVG.L
7.6%
VALW.L
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

IWVG.L
4.5%
VALW.L
4.9%

Energy

IWVG.L
3.8%
VALW.L
4.1%

Basic Materials

IWVG.L
3.0%
VALW.L
3.2%

Utilities

IWVG.L
2.5%
VALW.L
2.7%

Real Estate

IWVG.L
1.8%
VALW.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWVG.L vs. VALW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

VALW.L
VALW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VALW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VALW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VALW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VALW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VALW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWVG.L vs. VALW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) and SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWVG.LVALW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.72

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.08

6.51

+2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.80

24.41

+9.38

IWVG.L vs. VALW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.78, which is comparable to the VALW.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWVG.L and VALW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWVG.LVALW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78

3.84

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.28

1.14

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.67

+0.06

Drawdowns

IWVG.L vs. VALW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWVG.L drawdown since its inception was -28.07%, roughly equal to the maximum VALW.L drawdown of -28.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWVG.L and VALW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWVG.LVALW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-28.59%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.02%

-7.04%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.79%

-14.24%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.79%

-14.24%

+0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-4.55%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.88%

+0.01%

Volatility

IWVG.L vs. VALW.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) at 4.22%. This indicates that IWVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VALW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWVG.LVALW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

4.22%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

9.57%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

11.92%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.07%

12.65%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

16.68%

-1.11%

IWVG.L vs. VALW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWVG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VALW.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWVG.L vs. VALW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IWVG.L nor VALW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.82%3.23%3.12%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%
VALW.L
SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWVG.L and VALW.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VALW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VALW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IWVG.L and 0.25% for VALW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWVG.L and VALW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer