IWS vs. WTV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) and WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. IWS is passively managed, while WTV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWS returned 8.94%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for WTV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWS charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.

Performance

IWS vs. WTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than WTV's 10.06% return.

IWS

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: 15.78%
• 6M: 14.47%
• 1Y: 26.77%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

WTV

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 22.34%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF	15.78%	10.82%	12.91%	12.52%	-12.29%	28.10%	4.83%	26.73%	-12.43%	1.97%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	10.06%	13.51%	23.99%	22.35%	-8.06%	30.59%	6.15%	29.69%	-8.29%	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and WTV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017	0.92

The correlation between IWS and WTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWS vs. WTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWS	WTV
Technology	18.7%	18.3%
Industrials	16.2%	10.3%
Financial Services	13.7%	18.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	10.6%
Real Estate	8.3%	5.4%
Healthcare	7.6%	7.5%
Energy	7.4%	6.4%
Utilities	6.6%	4.5%
Basic Materials	5.3%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	9.9%
Communication Services	3.1%	6.5%

Return for Risk

IWS vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS

IWS Risk / Return Rank: 67
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

WTV

WTV Risk / Return Rank: 61
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWS	WTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.89	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.75	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.34	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	3.14	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.39	10.16	+3.22

IWS vs. WTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the WTV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and WTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWS vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than WTV's maximum drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and WTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWS	WTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.40%	-42.18%	-20.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-7.15%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.57%	-18.49%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.23%	-19.30%	-1.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-1.54%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.00%	-5.03%	-2.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	2.20%	-0.20%

Volatility

IWS vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) at 3.65%. This indicates that IWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWS	WTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	3.65%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	8.20%	+1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	11.90%	+1.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.33%	17.08%	+0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.35%	20.16%	-0.81%

IWS vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IWS vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than WTV's 1.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF	1.34%	1.53%	1.50%	1.76%	1.93%	1.39%	1.87%	1.97%	2.53%	1.96%	2.10%	2.14%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	1.66%	1.59%	1.54%	1.62%	2.08%	1.55%	1.63%	1.44%	1.94%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWS and WTV in my portfolio?

IWS and WTV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWS or WTV?

IWS has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to WTV (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs WTV's -42.18%.

Which ETF is better, IWS or WTV?

On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.43% vs 8.94% for IWS. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWS or WTV?

Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWS or WTV?

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWS or WTV?

WTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.34% for IWS.

What is the main difference between IWS and WTV?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.12% for WTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.