IWS vs. SLV
IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Value Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWS returned 10.23%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IWS charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IWS vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 10.23%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
IWS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 15.06%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
IWS vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 15.06% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 13.14% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWS and SLV is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.22 |
IWS vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWS
SLV
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
IWS
SLV
-
Technology
IWS
SLV
-
Financial Services
IWS
SLV
-
Real Estate
IWS
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWS
SLV
-
Energy
IWS
SLV
-
Healthcare
IWS
SLV
-
Utilities
IWS
SLV
-
Basic Materials
IWS
SLV
Consumer Defensive
IWS
SLV
-
Communication Services
IWS
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWS vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IWS
SLV
IWS vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 1.89 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 2.07 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 2.62 | +0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.59 | 5.64 | +7.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.89 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.58 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.25 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
IWS vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.40% | -76.28% | +13.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -42.45% | +34.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.57% | -42.45% | +21.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -42.45% | +21.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.83% | -42.81% | -1.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -37.30% | +37.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -44.67% | +36.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 19.67% | -17.68% |
Volatility
IWS vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is 3.40%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 16.30% | -12.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 58.31% | -48.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 58.90% | -45.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 36.15% | -18.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 31.84% | -12.48% |
IWS vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWS vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWS and SLV have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IWS (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 10.23% for IWS. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SLV is Silver. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.50% for SLV.
IWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWS and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer