PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWS vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWS achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IWS has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.51%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.


IWS

1D
1.16%
1M
4.03%
YTD
16.45%
6M
15.28%
1Y
27.58%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
10.51%

SCHD

1D
0.89%
1M
3.37%
YTD
20.66%
6M
19.57%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
12.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
16.45%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
20.66%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between IWS and SCHD is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.88

The correlation between IWS and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWS vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWS
SCHD

Technology

18.2%
16.4%

Industrials

16.5%
7.5%

Financial Services

13.7%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
6.3%

Real Estate

8.2%

-

Energy

7.7%
16.2%

Healthcare

7.5%
18.8%

Utilities

6.5%
0.0%

Basic Materials

5.4%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
19.2%

Communication Services

3.0%
6.3%

Technology

IWS
18.2%
SCHD
16.4%

Industrials

IWS
16.5%
SCHD
7.5%

Financial Services

IWS
13.7%
SCHD
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IWS
8.4%
SCHD
6.3%

Real Estate

IWS
8.2%
SCHD

-

Energy

IWS
7.7%
SCHD
16.2%

Healthcare

IWS
7.5%
SCHD
18.8%

Utilities

IWS
6.5%
SCHD
0.0%

Basic Materials

IWS
5.4%
SCHD
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

IWS
4.8%
SCHD
19.2%

Communication Services

IWS
3.0%
SCHD
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWSSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

5.70

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.82

13.97

-0.15

IWS vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWS Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWS and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWS drawdown since its inception was -62.40%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWS and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWSSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.40%

-33.37%

-29.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-4.61%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-16.13%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-16.85%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

-33.37%

-10.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.03%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-3.31%

-4.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.89%

+0.11%

Volatility

IWS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that IWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWSSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

3.05%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

7.53%

+2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

10.93%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

14.38%

+2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

16.72%

+2.65%

IWS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWS has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

IWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.32%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.22%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWS has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWS dropped -62.40% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 10.51% for IWS. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for IWS.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 1.32% for IWS.

IWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWS and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWS and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer