PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWRD.L (iShares MSCI World UCITS) and MXWO.L (Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWRD.L returned 13.59%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for MXWO.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWRD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for MXWO.L.

Performance

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWRD.L is traded in GBp, while MXWO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MXWO.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWRD.L having a 9.97% return and MXWO.L slightly higher at 10.44%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWRD.L having a 13.59% annualized return and MXWO.L not far ahead at 13.96%.

IWRD.L

1D
0.10%
1M
5.04%
YTD
9.97%
6M
10.17%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
13.59%

MXWO.L

1D
0.04%
1M
5.16%
YTD
10.44%
6M
10.33%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
13.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWRD.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS		9.97%12.34%20.62%17.33%-8.62%23.21%11.80%22.77%-4.02%11.65%
MXWO.L
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF		10.44%12.22%21.28%18.33%-8.34%23.27%12.86%22.56%-3.69%12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IWRD.L and MXWO.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2011

0.86

The correlation between IWRD.L and MXWO.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWRD.L
MXWO.L

Technology

30.0%
28.3%

Financial Services

15.4%
15.7%

Industrials

10.8%
11.4%

Communication Services

9.2%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
5.2%

Energy

4.2%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.3%

Utilities

2.5%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

IWRD.L
30.0%
MXWO.L
28.3%

Financial Services

IWRD.L
15.4%
MXWO.L
15.7%

Industrials

IWRD.L
10.8%
MXWO.L
11.4%

Communication Services

IWRD.L
9.2%
MXWO.L
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IWRD.L
9.0%
MXWO.L
9.3%

Healthcare

IWRD.L
8.7%
MXWO.L
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

IWRD.L
5.3%
MXWO.L
5.2%

Energy

IWRD.L
4.2%
MXWO.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

IWRD.L
3.2%
MXWO.L
3.3%

Utilities

IWRD.L
2.5%
MXWO.L
2.7%

Real Estate

IWRD.L
1.8%
MXWO.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World UCITS

Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF

Often compared with IWRD.L:
IWRD.L vs. SWRD.ASIWRD.L vs. URTHIWRD.L vs. VWRL.LIWRD.L vs. HMWO.LIWRD.L vs. ACNIWRD.L vs. VTIWRD.L vs. DEM.L
Often compared with MXWO.L:
MXWO.L vs. MXWS.LMXWO.L vs. SSAC.LMXWO.L vs. IWDA.LMXWO.L vs. URTHMXWO.L vs. VTMXWO.L vs. ^NDXMXWO.L vs. SPY5.L

Return for Risk

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWRD.L
IWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
MXWO.L
MXWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MXWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWRD.LMXWO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.60
2.36

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.57
3.26

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.44

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

4.18

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.12

15.92

+0.21

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the MXWO.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWRD.L and MXWO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWRD.LMXWO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.36

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.90

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.90

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.95

-0.39

Drawdowns

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -38.28%, which is greater than MXWO.L's maximum drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.L and MXWO.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWRD.LMXWO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.28%

-25.97%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-6.51%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

-19.17%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

-19.17%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.30%

-25.97%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.10%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-3.33%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.71%

-0.05%

Volatility

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) is 2.55%, while Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWO.L) has a volatility of 3.35%. This indicates that IWRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXWO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWRD.LMXWO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

3.35%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

8.84%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

11.54%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

14.58%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

15.55%

-1.05%

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWRD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MXWO.L's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWRD.L vs. MXWO.L - Dividend Comparison

IWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while MXWO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWRD.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS		0.85%0.93%1.06%1.31%1.44%1.03%1.21%1.66%1.81%1.64%1.61%1.78%
MXWO.L
Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.90, IWRD.L and MXWO.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MXWO.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MXWO.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWRD.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IWRD.L and 0.19% for MXWO.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWRD.L and MXWO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer