IWRD.L vs. VWRL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L).
IWRD.L and VWRL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWRD.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 28, 2005. VWRL.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. Both IWRD.L and VWRL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWRD.L or VWRL.L.
Key characteristics
| IWRD.L | VWRL.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.20% | 18.61% |
| 1Y Return | 26.83% | 24.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.05% | 8.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.86% | 11.97% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.72% | 12.17% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.62 | 2.52 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.67 | 3.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.50 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.27 | 3.94 |
| Martin Ratio | 18.78 | 17.82 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.40% | 1.35% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.00% | 9.53% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.12% | -24.98% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWRD.L and VWRL.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IWRD.L vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IWRD.L achieves a 20.20% return, which is significantly higher than VWRL.L's 18.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWRD.L having a 12.72% annualized return and VWRL.L not far behind at 12.17%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWRD.L vs. VWRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWRD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRL.L's 0.22% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWRD.L vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWRD.L vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison
IWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than VWRL.L's 1.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWRD.L iShares MSCI World UCITS | 1.36% | 1.65% | 1.76% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 2.13% | 2.18% | 2.72% | 2.63% | 2.82% |
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.13% | 1.73% | 2.04% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.95% | 2.23% | 1.90% | 1.85% | 1.98% | 2.14% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
IWRD.L vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, which is greater than VWRL.L's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.L and VWRL.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWRD.L vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) have volatilities of 2.90% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.