IWRD.L vs. MVEW.L
IWRD.L (iShares MSCI World UCITS) and MVEW.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWRD.L returned 12.72%/yr vs 6.63%/yr for MVEW.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWRD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MVEW.L.
Performance
IWRD.L vs. MVEW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWRD.L is traded in GBp, while MVEW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MVEW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWRD.L achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly higher than MVEW.L's 0.37% return.
IWRD.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 9.71%
- 1Y
- 26.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.59%
MVEW.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 6.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- —
IWRD.L vs. MVEW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWRD.L iShares MSCI World UCITS | 9.97% | 12.34% | 20.62% | 17.33% | -8.62% | 23.21% | 8.05% |
MVEW.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.37% | 3.73% | 12.44% | 4.00% | -0.60% | 18.17% | -1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWRD.L and MVEW.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2020 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IWRD.L and MVEW.L has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IWRD.L vs. MVEW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Financial Services
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Industrials
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Communication Services
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Consumer Cyclical
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Healthcare
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Consumer Defensive
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Energy
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Basic Materials
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Utilities
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Real Estate
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWRD.L vs. MVEW.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWRD.L
MVEW.L
IWRD.L vs. MVEW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWRD.L | MVEW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.07 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.07 | 0.56 | +3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 1.47 | +14.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWRD.L | MVEW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 0.41 | +2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.68 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.60 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
IWRD.L vs. MVEW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -38.28%, which is greater than MVEW.L's maximum drawdown of -10.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.L and MVEW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWRD.L | MVEW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.28% | -10.07% | -28.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -5.85% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.93% | -9.04% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.93% | -10.07% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -3.02% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -2.57% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.22% | -0.56% |
Volatility
IWRD.L vs. MVEW.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWRD.L | MVEW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 2.63% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | 5.97% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.28% | 8.00% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.27% | 9.78% | +3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 10.08% | +4.42% |
IWRD.L vs. MVEW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWRD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MVEW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWRD.L vs. MVEW.L - Dividend Comparison
IWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while MVEW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWRD.L iShares MSCI World UCITS | 0.85% | 0.93% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.44% | 1.03% | 1.21% | 1.66% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.78% |
MVEW.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWRD.L and MVEW.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MVEW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MVEW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWRD.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IWRD.L and 0.30% for MVEW.L.
Find the right allocation for IWRD.L and MVEW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer