PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWRD.L vs. MINV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWRD.L (iShares MSCI World UCITS) and MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds from iShares tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWRD.L returned 13.59%/yr vs 7.86%/yr for MINV.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWRD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MINV.L.

Performance

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWRD.L achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IWRD.L has outperformed MINV.L with an annualized return of 13.59%, while MINV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.86% annualized return.

IWRD.L

1D
0.10%
1M
3.66%
YTD
9.97%
6M
9.71%
1Y
26.73%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
13.59%

MINV.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.90%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3.15%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWRD.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS		9.97%12.34%20.62%17.33%-8.62%23.21%11.80%22.77%-4.02%11.65%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		1.01%3.37%12.86%1.50%1.23%15.98%-1.05%18.84%3.17%7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IWRD.L and MINV.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2012

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between IWRD.L and MINV.L has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWRD.L
MINV.L

Technology

30.0%
21.3%

Financial Services

15.4%
14.2%

Industrials

10.8%
9.1%

Communication Services

9.2%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
5.4%

Healthcare

8.7%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
10.8%

Energy

4.2%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.2%
1.0%

Utilities

2.5%
7.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.7%

Technology

IWRD.L
30.0%
MINV.L
21.3%

Financial Services

IWRD.L
15.4%
MINV.L
14.2%

Industrials

IWRD.L
10.8%
MINV.L
9.1%

Communication Services

IWRD.L
9.2%
MINV.L
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IWRD.L
9.0%
MINV.L
5.4%

Healthcare

IWRD.L
8.7%
MINV.L
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

IWRD.L
5.3%
MINV.L
10.8%

Energy

IWRD.L
4.2%
MINV.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

IWRD.L
3.2%
MINV.L
1.0%

Utilities

IWRD.L
2.5%
MINV.L
7.7%

Real Estate

IWRD.L
1.8%
MINV.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World UCITS

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF

Often compared with IWRD.L:
IWRD.L vs. SWRD.ASIWRD.L vs. URTHIWRD.L vs. VWRL.LIWRD.L vs. HMWO.LIWRD.L vs. ACNIWRD.L vs. VTIWRD.L vs. DEM.L
Often compared with MINV.L:
MINV.L vs. MVEW.LMINV.L vs. CSH2.LMINV.L vs. FULVXMINV.L vs. MVEA.LMINV.L vs. SPYMINV.L vs. AORMINV.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWRD.L
IWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWRD.LMINV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.60
0.32

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.57
0.53

+3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.06

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

0.41

+3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.12

1.10

+15.03

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWRD.L and MINV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWRD.LMINV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

0.32

+2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.65

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.66

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.83

-0.27

Drawdowns

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -38.28%, which is greater than MINV.L's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.L and MINV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWRD.LMINV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.28%

-20.38%

-17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-6.31%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

-8.47%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

-10.23%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.30%

-20.38%

-4.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-3.60%

+3.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-3.74%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.33%

-0.67%

Volatility

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) have volatilities of 2.55% and 2.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWRD.LMINV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

2.55%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

5.92%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

7.92%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

9.70%

+3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

11.85%

+2.65%

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWRD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWRD.L vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

IWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while MINV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWRD.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS		0.85%0.93%1.06%1.31%1.44%1.03%1.21%1.66%1.81%1.64%1.61%1.78%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IWRD.L and MINV.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MINV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MINV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWRD.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IWRD.L and 0.35% for MINV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWRD.L and MINV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer