PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDIN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWRD.L is traded in GBp, while IDIN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDIN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWRD.L achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than IDIN.L's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IWRD.L has outperformed IDIN.L with an annualized return of 12.32%, while IDIN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.77% annualized return.


IWRD.L

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.91%
6M
9.57%
YTD
9.97%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
12.32%
ALL TIME*
10.27%

IDIN.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
0.97%
6M
11.09%
YTD
12.51%
1Y
16.58%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
6.77%
ALL TIME*
6.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWRD.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS
9.97%12.34%20.62%17.33%-8.62%23.21%11.80%22.77%-4.02%11.65%
IDIN.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
12.51%4.93%10.69%-5.02%5.26%18.27%-4.84%19.26%3.77%4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IWRD.L and IDIN.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2007

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between IWRD.L and IDIN.L has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWRD.L
IDIN.L

Technology

30.3%
0.3%

Financial Services

16.3%
0.0%

Industrials

11.1%
21.6%

Healthcare

8.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
0.3%

Communication Services

8.5%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.8%
16.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.5%
54.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
4.0%

Technology

IWRD.L
30.3%
IDIN.L
0.3%

Financial Services

IWRD.L
16.3%
IDIN.L
0.0%

Industrials

IWRD.L
11.1%
IDIN.L
21.6%

Healthcare

IWRD.L
8.9%
IDIN.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWRD.L
8.8%
IDIN.L
0.3%

Communication Services

IWRD.L
8.5%
IDIN.L
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

IWRD.L
4.9%
IDIN.L

-

Energy

IWRD.L
3.8%
IDIN.L
16.6%

Basic Materials

IWRD.L
3.1%
IDIN.L

-

Utilities

IWRD.L
2.5%
IDIN.L
54.5%

Real Estate

IWRD.L
1.7%
IDIN.L
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWRD.L
IWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IDIN.L
IDIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IDIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IDIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWRD.LIDIN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

3.31

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.95

7.46

+4.49

IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the IDIN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWRD.L and IDIN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -66.71%, which is greater than IDIN.L's maximum drawdown of -36.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.L and IDIN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWRD.LIDIN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.71%

-36.86%

-29.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-4.98%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

-11.31%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

-23.50%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.30%

-27.06%

+1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.39%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.25%

-7.25%

-10.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.22%

-0.51%

Volatility

IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) is 2.78%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDIN.L) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that IWRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDIN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWRD.LIDIN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

3.58%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

9.68%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

11.73%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

13.10%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.44%

14.46%

-0.02%

IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWRD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IDIN.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWRD.L vs. IDIN.L - Dividend Comparison

IWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than IDIN.L's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDIN.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.04%2.20%2.36%2.37%2.11%1.93%2.08%2.05%2.34%2.60%2.80%3.20%
IWRD.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS
0.88%0.93%1.06%1.31%1.44%1.03%1.21%1.66%1.81%1.64%1.61%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWRD.L and IDIN.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWRD.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IDIN.L.

IWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IDIN.L is Mid Cap Value Equities. IWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IDIN.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IWRD.L and 0.65% for IDIN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWRD.L and IDIN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer