PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWRD.L vs. BATG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IWRD.L (iShares MSCI World UCITS) and BATG.L (L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BATG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWRD.L returned 12.72%/yr vs 17.37%/yr for BATG.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWRD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BATG.L.

Performance

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWRD.L achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than BATG.L's 34.23% return.

IWRD.L

1D
0.10%
1M
5.04%
YTD
9.97%
6M
10.17%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
13.59%

BATG.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
34.23%
6M
39.36%
1Y
129.36%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.37%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IWRD.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS		9.97%12.34%20.62%17.33%-8.62%23.21%11.80%22.77%-5.83%
BATG.L
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF		34.23%60.42%0.47%2.83%-3.91%17.00%75.38%12.95%-17.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IWRD.L and BATG.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2018

0.72

The correlation between IWRD.L and BATG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IWRD.L
BATG.L

Technology

30.0%
17.6%

Financial Services

15.4%

-

Industrials

10.8%
31.2%

Communication Services

9.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
20.1%

Healthcare

8.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.3%

-

Energy

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

3.2%
24.4%

Utilities

2.5%
6.7%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

IWRD.L
30.0%
BATG.L
17.6%

Financial Services

IWRD.L
15.4%
BATG.L

-

Industrials

IWRD.L
10.8%
BATG.L
31.2%

Communication Services

IWRD.L
9.2%
BATG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWRD.L
9.0%
BATG.L
20.1%

Healthcare

IWRD.L
8.7%
BATG.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IWRD.L
5.3%
BATG.L

-

Energy

IWRD.L
4.2%
BATG.L

-

Basic Materials

IWRD.L
3.2%
BATG.L
24.4%

Utilities

IWRD.L
2.5%
BATG.L
6.7%

Real Estate

IWRD.L
1.8%
BATG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World UCITS

L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF

Often compared with IWRD.L:
IWRD.L vs. SWRD.ASIWRD.L vs. URTHIWRD.L vs. VWRL.LIWRD.L vs. HMWO.LIWRD.L vs. ACNIWRD.L vs. VTIWRD.L vs. DEM.L
Often compared with BATG.L:
BATG.L vs. DPGT.LBATG.L vs. HIWO.LBATG.L vs. CHRG.LBATG.L vs. WMVG.LBATG.L vs. HTWG.LBATG.L vs. HBGD.TOBATG.L vs. XMWD.L

Return for Risk

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWRD.L
IWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
BATG.L
BATG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
BATG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BATG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) and L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWRD.LBATG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.60
4.61

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.57
4.96

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.66

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.07

9.45

-5.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.12

32.41

-16.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is lower than the BATG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWRD.L and BATG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWRD.LBATG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

4.61

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.77

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.80

-0.24

Drawdowns

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -38.28%, which is greater than BATG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.L and BATG.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWRD.LBATG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.28%

-33.37%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-13.61%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

-33.37%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.93%

-33.37%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.30%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-4.18%

+4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-8.99%

+4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

3.98%

-2.32%

Volatility

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World UCITS (IWRD.L) is 2.55%, while L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF (BATG.L) has a volatility of 10.12%. This indicates that IWRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWRD.LBATG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

10.12%

-7.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.30%

22.09%

-14.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

27.90%

-17.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

22.54%

-9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

22.86%

-8.36%

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWRD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BATG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWRD.L vs. BATG.L - Dividend Comparison

IWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while BATG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATG.L
L&G Battery Value-Chain UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWRD.L
iShares MSCI World UCITS		0.85%0.93%1.06%1.31%1.44%1.03%1.21%1.66%1.81%1.64%1.61%1.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

IWRD.L and BATG.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BATG.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BATG.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWRD.L.

IWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BATG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. IWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while BATG.L tracks Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General Investment Management. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IWRD.L and 0.49% for BATG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWRD.L and BATG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer