PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWRD.AS vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWRD.AS vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWRD.AS is traded in EUR, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IWRD.AS having a 11.01% return and SWDA.L slightly lower at 10.97%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWRD.AS having a 12.57% annualized return and SWDA.L not far ahead at 12.82%.


IWRD.AS

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.53%
YTD
11.01%
6M
11.58%
1Y
23.56%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
12.57%

SWDA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.83%
YTD
10.97%
6M
11.38%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWRD.AS vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWRD.AS
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF
11.01%6.83%26.78%19.68%-13.85%32.06%5.87%29.11%-4.38%7.51%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.97%6.76%26.95%20.08%-13.06%31.68%6.15%30.86%-4.97%7.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IWRD.AS and SWDA.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2009

0.86

The correlation between IWRD.AS and SWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWRD.AS vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWRD.AS
IWRD.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWRD.AS vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWRD.ASSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.63

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

14.82

-1.12

IWRD.AS vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWRD.AS and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWRD.ASSWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.18

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.92

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.85

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.85

-0.35

Drawdowns

IWRD.AS vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWRD.AS drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.AS and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWRD.ASSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.51%

-33.00%

-19.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-6.53%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.50%

-20.55%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-20.55%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.71%

-33.00%

-0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.30%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-4.31%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.60%

+0.11%

Volatility

IWRD.AS vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.22%. This indicates that IWRD.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWRD.ASSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.22%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

7.56%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

10.88%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

14.07%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

15.15%

+0.01%

IWRD.AS vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWRD.AS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWRD.AS vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

IWRD.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWRD.AS
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF
0.85%0.95%1.05%1.32%1.49%1.01%1.21%1.62%1.84%1.67%1.70%1.80%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IWRD.AS and SWDA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWRD.AS.

IWRD.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IWRD.AS and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWRD.AS and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer