PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWRD.AS vs. IWDA.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWRD.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWRD.AS having a 11.01% return and IWDA.AS slightly higher at 11.10%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWRD.AS having a 12.57% annualized return and IWDA.AS not far ahead at 12.88%.


IWRD.AS

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.53%
YTD
11.01%
6M
11.58%
1Y
23.56%
3Y*
17.32%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
12.57%

IWDA.AS

1D
-0.31%
1M
5.58%
YTD
11.10%
6M
11.60%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWRD.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWRD.AS
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF
11.01%6.83%26.78%19.68%-13.85%32.06%5.87%29.11%-4.38%7.51%
IWDA.AS
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.10%7.08%27.23%19.89%-13.54%32.54%6.20%29.58%-4.16%7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IWRD.AS and IWDA.AS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2009

0.97

The correlation between IWRD.AS and IWDA.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWRD.AS vs. IWDA.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWRD.AS
IWRD.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWRD.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.AS
IWDA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IWDA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWRD.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWRD.ASIWDA.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.65

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

14.56

-0.85

IWRD.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWRD.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the IWDA.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWRD.AS and IWDA.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWRD.ASIWDA.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.16

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.90

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.85

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.82

-0.32

Drawdowns

IWRD.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWRD.AS drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than IWDA.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWRD.AS and IWDA.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWRD.ASIWDA.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.51%

-33.63%

-18.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.69%

-6.45%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.50%

-21.59%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.50%

-21.59%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.71%

-33.63%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.31%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-4.25%

-4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.63%

+0.08%

Volatility

IWRD.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF (IWRD.AS) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWRD.ASIWDA.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.79%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

7.61%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

10.96%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

14.08%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

15.00%

+0.16%

IWRD.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWRD.AS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.AS's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWRD.AS vs. IWDA.AS - Dividend Comparison

IWRD.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while IWDA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWDA.AS
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWRD.AS
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF
0.85%0.95%1.05%1.32%1.49%1.01%1.21%1.62%1.84%1.67%1.70%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, IWRD.AS and IWDA.AS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IWDA.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWDA.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWRD.AS.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IWRD.AS and 0.20% for IWDA.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWRD.AS and IWDA.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer