IWP vs. SOXX
IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWP returned 11.74%/yr vs 33.06%/yr for SOXX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWP charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
IWP vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWP achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 73.46% return. Over the past 10 years, IWP has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 11.74%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 33.06% annualized return.
IWP
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- -1.25%
- 3Y*
- 11.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
SOXX
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -12.99%
- 6M
- 52.53%
- YTD
- 73.46%
- 1Y
- 112.65%
- 3Y*
- 44.30%
- 5Y*
- 30.72%
- 10Y*
- 33.06%
IWP vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.63% | 8.45% | 21.86% | 25.70% | -26.90% | 12.60% | 35.25% | 35.04% | -4.89% | 24.93% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 73.46% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWP and SOXX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2001 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IWP and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWP vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWP
SOXX
Technology
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
IWP
SOXX
Industrials
IWP
SOXX
-
Healthcare
IWP
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
IWP
SOXX
-
Energy
IWP
SOXX
-
Financial Services
IWP
SOXX
-
Communication Services
IWP
SOXX
-
Utilities
IWP
SOXX
-
Real Estate
IWP
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
IWP
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
IWP
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWP vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
IWP
SOXX
IWP vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWP | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.40 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 5.57 | -5.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 20.65 | -20.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWP vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWP drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWP and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWP | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.92% | -70.21% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -20.34% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.20% | -41.36% | +16.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.62% | -45.75% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.62% | -45.75% | +7.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.02% | -20.34% | +14.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -19.92% | +10.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 5.48% | -0.31% |
Volatility
IWP vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) is 5.15%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 19.91%. This indicates that IWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWP | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 19.91% | -14.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.79% | 36.90% | -23.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 42.46% | -25.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 37.82% | -15.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 34.30% | -12.61% |
IWP vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWP has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWP vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
IWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than SOXX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.16% | 0.98% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.28% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWP and SOXX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (19.91%) compared to IWP (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWP dropped -56.92% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 33.06% vs 11.74% for IWP. On fees, IWP is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IWP has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 33.06% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWP is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SOXX.
IWP has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.28% for SOXX.
IWP is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IWP and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWP and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer